On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:16:54PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I've started
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:41:32PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
[...]
> ..and what you're sketching out here should work with recent enough
> versions of our bootloader.
>
> However, to me having an ACPI Device Path component in there doesn't
> make much sense on a board without ACPI. It
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >
>> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
>> > loads
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
> > since not
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
>>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>>
>>> > Mind sending me or pastebin'ing your
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>
>> > Mind sending me or pastebin'ing your u-boot .config? There are some
>> > different device-path construction
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:49:43 -0400
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Rob Clark
>> >>
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> > Mind sending me or pastebin'ing your u-boot .config? There are some
> > different device-path construction depending on legacy vs
> > CONFIG_DM+CONFIG_BLK (the legacy case *looks* right to me, and
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:49:43 -0400
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Rob Clark
> >> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >
>> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
> > since not
On 08/06/2017 05:34 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
>> loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
>> since not a py expert or too
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
> since not a py expert or too familiar w/ u-boot's test framework. But
> I'll
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 15:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>
>> Things are already broken before that commit though, so there is
>> another problem. I'll see if I can figure out
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 15:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> Things are already broken before that commit though, so there is
> another problem. I'll see if I can figure out what it is...
data abort
pc : [<7ef59160>] lr : [<7ef59118>]
reloc pc :
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 11:36:25 -0400
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 11:36:25 -0400
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 11:36:25 -0400
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >> On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>>
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:28:34 -0400
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> >
> > OpenBSD doesn't run on the db410c. However, our EFI bootloader should
> > just run. You can download it from:
> >
> >
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 05:22 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
From: Rob Clark
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
On 08/05/2017 05:22 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>>>
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>>> wrote:
>
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mark Kettenis
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200
On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
>>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>>
>>> Unfortunately something in this patch series breaks things for me
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
> >> From: Mark Kettenis
> >>
> >> Unfortunately
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>
>> Unfortunately something in this patch series breaks things for me on a
>> Banana Pi:
>
> And according to git
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> Unfortunately something in this patch series breaks things for me on a
> Banana Pi:
And according to git bisect:
4e3e748a50fc3f43e20c7ff407184596d7c9a589 is the first bad commit
commit
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> OpenBSD doesn't run on the db410c. However, our EFI bootloader should
> just run. You can download it from:
>
> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/arm64/BOOTAA64.EFI
>
> for the 64-bit (AArch64) and
>
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Rob Clark
>> >> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:31:55 -0400
>> >
>> > Hi Rob,
>> >
>> > OpenBSD has
> Authentication-Results: xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com;
> dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
>
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:31:55 -0400
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> OpenBSD has been an early adopter of efi_loader and pretty much
> completely relies on it for booting OpenBSD/armv7 and
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:31:55 -0400
Hi Rob,
OpenBSD has been an early adopter of efi_loader and pretty much
completely relies on it for booting OpenBSD/armv7 and OpenBSD/arm64.
We use our own bootloader which is fairly lightweight. Obviously we'd
like
Also, create disk objects for the disk itself, in addition to the
partitions. (UEFI terminology is a bit confusing, a "disk" object is
really a partition.) This helps grub properly identify the boot device
since it is trying to match up partition "disk" object with it's parent
device.
Now
36 matches
Mail list logo