Hi Pekon,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 07:42:09AM +, Pekon Gupta wrote:
From: Brian Norris
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:42:56PM +0530, Pekon Gupta wrote:
As there were parallel set of patches running between u-boot and kernel.
I don't know what patches you're talking about.
Following
Hi Brian,
From: Gupta, Pekon
I'm preparing a 3.14 pull request soon, and since you seem committed to
fixing and properly testing a known regression here, I'd like to see
this go in. But given the late timing and the unanswered questions, I
think it's unlikely to go in -rc1. Perhaps I can send a
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Gupta, Pekon pe...@ti.com wrote:
From: Brian Norris
1. This patch series talks extensively about U-Boot. U-Boot is not my
interest, nor should it be the focus of kernel (driver) development.
Any work done here should be framed in the kernel driver context.
Hi Brian,
From: Brian Norris
1. This patch series talks extensively about U-Boot. U-Boot is not my
interest, nor should it be the focus of kernel (driver) development.
Any work done here should be framed in the kernel driver context. [1]
Apologies for cross-posting, I understand that you
Hi Brian,
From: Brian Norris
Hi Pekon,
Sorry, I'm revisiting your patch series a bit late. There are a few
factors that contributed to this, though.
1. This patch series talks extensively about U-Boot. U-Boot is not my
interest, nor should it be the focus of kernel (driver) development.
Hi Pekon,
Sorry, I'm revisiting your patch series a bit late. There are a few
factors that contributed to this, though.
1. This patch series talks extensively about U-Boot. U-Boot is not my
interest, nor should it be the focus of kernel (driver) development.
Any work done here should be
Hi Brian,
From: Enric Balletbo Serra [mailto:eballe...@gmail.com]
2014/1/6 Stefan Roese s...@denx.de:
...
As there were parallel set of patches running between u-boot and kernel.
hence, some patch-sets caused regression for OMAP3x platforms when booting
using u-boot specifically for
Hello Enric, Nikita, and other OMAP3 users,
As there were parallel set of patches running between u-boot and kernel.
hence, some patch-sets caused regression for OMAP3x platforms when booting
using u-boot specifically for ecc-schemes (like BCH4_SW).
Hence this patch series fixes those
Hi Pekon,
On 06.01.2014 08:40, Gupta, Pekon wrote:
Hello Enric, Nikita, and other OMAP3 users,
As there were parallel set of patches running between u-boot and kernel.
hence, some patch-sets caused regression for OMAP3x platforms when booting
using u-boot specifically for ecc-schemes (like
As there were parallel set of patches running between u-boot and kernel.
hence, some patch-sets caused regression for OMAP3x platforms when booting
using u-boot specifically for ecc-schemes (like BCH4_SW).
Hence this patch series fixes those regressions, and tests complete
NAND boot sequence for
10 matches
Mail list logo