[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

(header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot. This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions implemented by Simon Glass, that can be in any case used to boot later a secure image. Freescale's secure

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot. This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions implemented by Simon Glass, that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

On 07/11/2013 11:11 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: snip Next step is to verify the kernel, that can be still done using Simon's patches for verified boot (CONFIG_OF_CONTROL must be set in the board configuarion file). I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 0/7] The patchset fixes some issue in the generation of the imx image

Thanks Stefano, On 07/11/2013 06:06 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: (header for Freescale's i.MX processors) to allow the usage of Freescale's tools to sign the u-boot image and provide a secure boot. This has nothing to do with the Secure Boot extensions implemented by Simon Glass, that can be in