Hi Jagan,
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:35 PM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jagan,
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:46 PM Lukasz Majewski
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Stefano, Fabio,
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Lukasz,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 21/01/19 15:19, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:35 PM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> Hi Jagan,
>
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:46 PM Lukasz Majewski
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Stefano, Fabio,
> > >
> > > > Hi Lukasz,
> > > >
> > > > On 21/01/19 15:19, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > > > Hi Fabio,
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi Luka
Hi Jagan,
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:46 PM Lukasz Majewski
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stefano, Fabio,
> >
> > > Hi Lukasz,
> > >
> > > On 21/01/19 15:19, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > > Hi Fabio,
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Lukasz,
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:15 AM Lukasz Majewski
> > >
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:46 PM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> Hi Stefano, Fabio,
>
> > Hi Lukasz,
> >
> > On 21/01/19 15:19, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > Hi Fabio,
> > >
> > >> Hi Lukasz,
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:15 AM Lukasz Majewski
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> +static ulong imx6q_clk_get
Hi Stefano, Fabio,
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On 21/01/19 15:19, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> >
> >> Hi Lukasz,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:15 AM Lukasz Majewski
> >> wrote:
> >>> +static ulong imx6q_clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> >>> +{
> >>> + ulong rate = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +
Hi Lukasz,
On 21/01/19 15:19, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
>> Hi Lukasz,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:15 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>
>>> +static ulong imx6q_clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
>>> +{
>>> + ulong rate = 0;
>>> +
>>> + debug("%s(#%lu)\n", __func__, clk->id);
>>>
Hi Lukasz,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:19 PM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> The rationale regarding this approach:
>
> 1. Reuse the clock.c code for iMX6Q as much as possible.
Yes, the problem is that clock.c does not scale well as we have
dedicated clock functions for each peripheral:
enable_uart_clk
Hi Fabio,
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:15 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>
> > +static ulong imx6q_clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> > +{
> > + ulong rate = 0;
> > +
> > + debug("%s(#%lu)\n", __func__, clk->id);
> > +
> > + switch (clk->id) {
> > + case IMX6QDL_CL
Hi Lukasz,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:15 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> +static ulong imx6q_clk_get_rate(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + ulong rate = 0;
> +
> + debug("%s(#%lu)\n", __func__, clk->id);
> +
> + switch (clk->id) {
> + case IMX6QDL_CLK_ECSPI1:
> + case IMX6QDL_CL
This commit provides support for setting USDHCx/ECSPIx clocks depending
on used bus. Moreover, it is agnostic to the alias numbering as the
information about the clock is read from device tree.
Last but not least - the current IMX6Q clock code in mach-imx/mx6/clock.c
has been reused to avoid code
10 matches
Mail list logo