Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: at91: Fix at91-pmc and at91-sckc's class ID

2016-09-05 Thread Simon Glass
On 30 August 2016 at 02:11, Wenyou Yang wrote: > The at91-pmc and at91-sckc aren't the clock providers, change their > class ID from UCLASS_CLK to UCLASS_SIMPLE_BUS, they also don't > need to bind the child nodes explicitly, the .post_bind callback > of simple_bus uclass will do it for them. > > S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: at91: Fix at91-pmc and at91-sckc's class ID

2016-08-30 Thread Stephen Warren
On 08/30/2016 02:11 AM, Wenyou Yang wrote: The at91-pmc and at91-sckc aren't the clock providers, change their class ID from UCLASS_CLK to UCLASS_SIMPLE_BUS, they also don't need to bind the child nodes explicitly, the .post_bind callback of simple_bus uclass will do it for them. This patch, Ac

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 1/2] clk: at91: Fix at91-pmc and at91-sckc's class ID

2016-08-30 Thread Wenyou Yang
The at91-pmc and at91-sckc aren't the clock providers, change their class ID from UCLASS_CLK to UCLASS_SIMPLE_BUS, they also don't need to bind the child nodes explicitly, the .post_bind callback of simple_bus uclass will do it for them. Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang --- drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c |