On Oct 29, 2008, at 10:05 AM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
Shouldn't we only be doing this for an agent? Also is the right
place to enable it? Just wondering if board code should have more
flexibility here.
>>>
>>> I was under the impression that if a PCIe interface was configured
>>> as
> >> Shouldn't we only be doing this for an agent? Also is the right
> >> place to enable it? Just wondering if board code should have more
> >> flexibility here.
> >
> > I was under the impression that if a PCIe interface was configured
> > as root complex its CFG_READY bit would still ne
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:03 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Hi Kumar,
>
>> On Oct 28, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>>> Set CFG_READY bit in Configuration Ready register for PCIe
>>> interfaces and clear ACL bit in PBFR register for PCI
>>> interfaces to allow devices to respond to incoming PCI
>>>
Hi Kumar,
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
>> Set CFG_READY bit in Configuration Ready register for PCIe
>> interfaces and clear ACL bit in PBFR register for PCI
>> interfaces to allow devices to respond to incoming PCI
>> configuration cycles.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser
On Oct 28, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Set CFG_READY bit in Configuration Ready register for PCIe
> interfaces and clear ACL bit in PBFR register for PCI
> interfaces to allow devices to respond to incoming PCI
> configuration cycles.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Set CFG_READY bit in Configuration Ready register for PCIe
interfaces and clear ACL bit in PBFR register for PCI
interfaces to allow devices to respond to incoming PCI
configuration cycles.
Signed-off-by: Peter Tyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Changes since v1:
- Anal retentive update to the commit m
6 matches
Mail list logo