On 04/03/2012 08:35 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 02 April 2012 19:07
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/kirkwood: add
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 04 April 2012 12:32
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
board_spi_bus_claim/release
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 02 April 2012 19:07
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
board_spi_bus_claim/release
Dear Prafulla,
On 03/30/2012 02:58 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 30 March 2012 17:45
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 29 March 2012 21:15
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
board_spi_bus_claim/release
Hi
Hi Prafulla,
For the simplicity of the discussion, I have removed everything in the
discussion that is not relevant for the current open point.
On 03/30/2012 01:34 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
In Kirkwood specific claim_bus API, you will backup default configuration
(which is NF in your case)
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 30 March 2012 17:45
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
board_spi_bus_claim/release
Hi
Hi Prafulla,
On 03/28/2012 09:48 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
On 03/26/2012 11:58 AM, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
Some kirkwood based boards may need to implement such function due
to
some HW designs.
I see no feedback from your side on this patch. I think you should go
through
the marvell
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 29 March 2012 18:20
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
board_spi_bus_claim/release
Hi
On 03/29/2012 04:21 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
On 03/28/2012 09:48 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
On 03/26/2012 11:58 AM, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
Some kirkwood based boards may need to implement such function due
Correct, this is exactly our use case: we have the NAND Flash
Controller and
Hi Prafulla,
On 03/29/2012 02:49 PM, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
On 03/28/2012 09:48 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
Basically spi_claim_bus and spi_release_bus are not supported in current
Kirkwood spi driver.
These are needed if someone wish to share the same interface pins with some
other
-Original Message-
From: Valentin Longchamp [mailto:valentin.longch...@keymile.com]
Sent: 27 March 2012 18:58
To: Prafulla Wadaskar
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gerlando Falauto; Holger Brunck
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
board_spi_bus_claim/release
Prafulla,
On 03/26/2012 11:58 AM, Valentin Longchamp wrote:
Some kirkwood based boards may need to implement such function due to
some HW designs.
I see no feedback from your side on this patch. I think you should go through
the marvell tree:
- the spi_claim/release_bus function are already
Some kirkwood based boards may need to implement such function due to
some HW designs.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp valentin.longch...@keymile.com
cc: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com
cc: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
cc: Holger Brunck holger.bru...@keymile.com
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
