Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support

2013/12/23 Marek Vasut : > On Monday, December 23, 2013 at 01:50:36 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: >> 2013/12/20 Marek Vasut : >> > On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: >> >> From: Kuo-Jung Su >> >> >> >> 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support

On Monday, December 23, 2013 at 01:50:36 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: > 2013/12/20 Marek Vasut : > > On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: > >> From: Kuo-Jung Su > >> > >> 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra > >> delay is necessary to avoid d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support

2013/12/20 Marek Vasut : > On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: >> From: Kuo-Jung Su >> >> 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra >> delay is necessary to avoid data corruption while handling packets with >> size greater than 64 bytes. >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support

On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: > From: Kuo-Jung Su > > 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra > delay is necessary to avoid data corruption while handling packets with > size greater than 64 bytes. > > 2. Since hardware revision 1.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround & new hardware support

From: Kuo-Jung Su 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra delay is necessary to avoid data corruption while handling packets with size greater than 64 bytes. 2. Since hardware revision 1.11.0, some fields of interrupt status registers are now write-1-clear