Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround new hardware support

2013-12-24 Thread Kuo-Jung Su
2013/12/23 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: On Monday, December 23, 2013 at 01:50:36 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: 2013/12/20 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: From: Kuo-Jung Su dant...@faraday-tech.com 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround new hardware support

2013-12-23 Thread Marek Vasut
On Monday, December 23, 2013 at 01:50:36 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: 2013/12/20 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: From: Kuo-Jung Su dant...@faraday-tech.com 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra delay

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround new hardware support

2013-12-22 Thread Kuo-Jung Su
2013/12/20 Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de: On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: From: Kuo-Jung Su dant...@faraday-tech.com 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra delay is necessary to avoid data corruption while handling packets with size

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround new hardware support

2013-12-20 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, December 20, 2013 at 05:32:58 AM, Kuo-Jung Su wrote: From: Kuo-Jung Su dant...@faraday-tech.com 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra delay is necessary to avoid data corruption while handling packets with size greater than 64 bytes. 2. Since

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: fotg210: workaround new hardware support

2013-12-19 Thread Kuo-Jung Su
From: Kuo-Jung Su dant...@faraday-tech.com 1. It's known that EP0 fifo empty indication is not reliable, an extra delay is necessary to avoid data corruption while handling packets with size greater than 64 bytes. 2. Since hardware revision 1.11.0, some fields of interrupt status registers