Hi Minkyu,
On 28 May 2014 07:02, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Simon Glass,
>
> On 27/05/14 09:01, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Minkyu,
>>
>> On 25 May 2014 21:15, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> Dear Simon,
>>>
>>> On 23/05/14 02:27, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
On 21 May 2014 15:20, Minkyu Kang
Dear Simon Glass,
On 27/05/14 09:01, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On 25 May 2014 21:15, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>> Dear Simon,
>>
>> On 23/05/14 02:27, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Minkyu,
>>>
>>> On 21 May 2014 15:20, Minkyu Kang wrote:
On 22/05/14 03:58, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Minkyu
Hi Minkyu,
On 25 May 2014 21:15, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> On 23/05/14 02:27, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Minkyu,
>>
>> On 21 May 2014 15:20, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> On 22/05/14 03:58, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
On 21 May 2014 00:05, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> On 20/05/14
Dear Simon,
On 23/05/14 02:27, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On 21 May 2014 15:20, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>> On 22/05/14 03:58, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Minkyu,
>>>
>>> On 21 May 2014 00:05, Minkyu Kang wrote:
On 20/05/14 20:47, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On 15 May
Hi David,
On 22 May 2014 08:24, David Nelson wrote:
>
> On 14-05-22 11:27 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Minkyu,
>>
>> On 21 May 2014 15:20, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22/05/14 03:58, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
On 21 May 2014 00:05, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>
> On 2
On 14-05-22 11:27 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
On 21 May 2014 15:20, Minkyu Kang wrote:
On 22/05/14 03:58, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
On 21 May 2014 00:05, Minkyu Kang wrote:
On 20/05/14 20:47, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
On 15 May 2014 00:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
On 03/04/14
Hi Minkyu,
On 21 May 2014 15:20, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> On 22/05/14 03:58, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Minkyu,
>>
>> On 21 May 2014 00:05, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> On 20/05/14 20:47, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Minkyu,
On 15 May 2014 00:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> On 03/04/14 08:24, Simon Gl
On 22/05/14 03:58, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On 21 May 2014 00:05, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>> On 20/05/14 20:47, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Minkyu,
>>>
>>> On 15 May 2014 00:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
On 03/04/14 08:24, Simon Glass wrote:
> From: Aaron Durbin
>
> The TSP65090 i
Hi Minkyu,
On 21 May 2014 00:05, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> On 20/05/14 20:47, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Minkyu,
>>
>> On 15 May 2014 00:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> On 03/04/14 08:24, Simon Glass wrote:
From: Aaron Durbin
The TSP65090 is a PMIC on some exynos5 boards. The init function i
On 20/05/14 20:47, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Minkyu,
>
> On 15 May 2014 00:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>> On 03/04/14 08:24, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> From: Aaron Durbin
>>>
>>> The TSP65090 is a PMIC on some exynos5 boards. The init function is
>>> called for the TPS65090 pmic. If that device is not a pa
Hi Minkyu,
On 15 May 2014 00:51, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> On 03/04/14 08:24, Simon Glass wrote:
>> From: Aaron Durbin
>>
>> The TSP65090 is a PMIC on some exynos5 boards. The init function is
>> called for the TPS65090 pmic. If that device is not a part of the device
>> tree (returns -ENODEV) then c
On 03/04/14 08:24, Simon Glass wrote:
> From: Aaron Durbin
>
> The TSP65090 is a PMIC on some exynos5 boards. The init function is
> called for the TPS65090 pmic. If that device is not a part of the device
> tree (returns -ENODEV) then continue. Otherwise return a failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aar
From: Aaron Durbin
The TSP65090 is a PMIC on some exynos5 boards. The init function is
called for the TPS65090 pmic. If that device is not a part of the device
tree (returns -ENODEV) then continue. Otherwise return a failure.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Reviewed-by:
13 matches
Mail list logo