On 11/22/19 6:32 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/22/19 1:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/22/19 12:58 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 11/22/19 8:47 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:50 AM Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
>
> On 11/22/19 1:25 AM, Mare
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 06:32:13PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/22/19 1:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 11/22/19 12:58 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 11/22/19 8:47 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:50 AM Heinrich Schuchardt
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
On 11/22/19 1:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/22/19 12:58 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/22/19 8:47 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:50 AM Heinrich Schuchardt
wrote:
On 11/22/19 1:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/21/19 10:15 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Since upg
On 11/22/19 12:58 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/22/19 8:47 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:50 AM Heinrich Schuchardt
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/22/19 1:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/21/19 10:15 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Since upgrading to gcc9, warni
On 11/22/19 8:47 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:50 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/22/19 1:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/21/19 10:15 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Since upgrading to gcc9, warnings are issued:
"taking address of packed member of ‘...’ may result i
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 7:50 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 11/22/19 1:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 11/21/19 10:15 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >> Since upgrading to gcc9, warnings are issued:
> >> "taking address of packed member of ‘...’ may result in an unaligned
> >> pointer value"
On 11/22/19 1:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/21/19 10:15 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Since upgrading to gcc9, warnings are issued:
"taking address of packed member of ‘...’ may result in an unaligned
pointer value"
Fix this by converting two functions to use unaligned access since packed
stru
On 11/21/19 10:15 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Since upgrading to gcc9, warnings are issued:
> "taking address of packed member of ‘...’ may result in an unaligned
> pointer value"
>
> Fix this by converting two functions to use unaligned access since packed
> structures may be on an unaligned a
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:15:22 +0100
Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Since upgrading to gcc9, warnings are issued:
> "taking address of packed member of ‘...’ may result in an unaligned
> pointer value"
>
> Fix this by converting two functions to use unaligned access since
> packed structures may be on
Since upgrading to gcc9, warnings are issued:
"taking address of packed member of ‘...’ may result in an unaligned
pointer value"
Fix this by converting two functions to use unaligned access since packed
structures may be on an unaligned address, depending on USB hardware.
Signed-off-by: Simon Go
10 matches
Mail list logo