On 04/03/2015 13:13, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Freescale boards are currently all defined in arch/arm/Kconfig, which
makes them hard to detect.
Moreover the MX6 SoC variant (Q, D, DL, S, SL) selection is currently
done via the SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS option which marked as deprecated.
Move to a more
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:43:44 +0100
Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 04/03/2015 13:50, Boris Brezillon wrote:
If that's accepted, then yes I could help moving boards from the old
approach to the new one, though I was expecting this to be done by
board
Hi Boris,
On 18/03/2015 10:49, Boris Brezillon wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:43:44 +0100
Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 04/03/2015 13:50, Boris Brezillon wrote:
If that's accepted, then yes I could help moving boards from the old
approach to the new
Hi Boris,
On 04/03/2015 13:50, Boris Brezillon wrote:
If that's accepted, then yes I could help moving boards from the old
approach to the new one, though I was expecting this to be done by
board maintainers.
Note that I'm not breaking anything (the old boards definition are
still
Freescale boards are currently all defined in arch/arm/Kconfig, which
makes them hard to detect.
Moreover the MX6 SoC variant (Q, D, DL, S, SL) selection is currently
done via the SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS option which marked as deprecated.
Move to a more standard way to select sub-architecture and board
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:43:59 -0300
Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Boris Brezillon
boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Freescale boards are currently all defined in arch/arm/Kconfig, which
makes them hard to detect.
Moreover the MX6 SoC
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Boris Brezillon
boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Freescale boards are currently all defined in arch/arm/Kconfig, which
makes them hard to detect.
Moreover the MX6 SoC variant (Q, D, DL, S, SL) selection is currently
done via the SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS option
7 matches
Mail list logo
