Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] rockchip: clk: rk3399: allow requests for PCLK_EFUSE1024NS

2017-05-02 Thread sjg
On 28 April 2017 at 09:11, Philipp Tomsich wrote: > The (non-secure) efuse node in the DTS requests PCLK_EFUSE1024NS. > To allow us to add a efuse-driver (and more importantly, to allow > probes of such a driver to succeed), we need need to accept requests >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] rockchip: clk: rk3399: allow requests for PCLK_EFUSE1024NS

2017-04-29 Thread Simon Glass
On 28 April 2017 at 09:11, Philipp Tomsich wrote: > The (non-secure) efuse node in the DTS requests PCLK_EFUSE1024NS. > To allow us to add a efuse-driver (and more importantly, to allow > probes of such a driver to succeed), we need need to accept requests >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/5] rockchip: clk: rk3399: allow requests for PCLK_EFUSE1024NS

2017-04-28 Thread Philipp Tomsich
The (non-secure) efuse node in the DTS requests PCLK_EFUSE1024NS. To allow us to add a efuse-driver (and more importantly, to allow probes of such a driver to succeed), we need need to accept requests for PCLK_EFUSE1024NS and return a non-error result. As PCLK_EFUSE1024NS is enabled by default