Applied to u-boot-dm.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Hans,
On 15 November 2015 at 12:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/13/2015 10:58 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hans,
>
>
>
>
> Talking about usb-stop, there is still one (BIG!) problem after
> this patch set when building usb-support with DM_DEVICE_REMOVE
> not set. This
Hi,
On 11/13/2015 10:58 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans,
Talking about usb-stop, there is still one (BIG!) problem after
this patch set when building usb-support with DM_DEVICE_REMOVE
not set. This means that the controllers dma engines will not
be stopped when booting the actual OS and they
Hi Hans,
On 12 November 2015 at 07:08, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11-11-15 19:15, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On 11 November 2015 at 10:02, Hans de Goede
>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>> Ok, I've ran a whole battery of tests on your u-boot-dm/usb-working
>>> branch.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
Hi,
On 11-11-15 19:15, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 11 November 2015 at 10:02, Hans de Goede wrote:
Ok, I've ran a whole battery of tests on your u-boot-dm/usb-working branch.
Thanks!
There are 2 issues:
1) You need to add these change to the commit introducing usb-keyb dm
support
Hi,
On 11-11-15 00:30, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 9 November 2015 at 12:25, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 9 November 2015 at 00:22, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09-11-15 07:48, Simon Glass wrote:
Each scan of the USB bus may return different results. Existing
driver-model
devices ar
Hi Hans,
On 11 November 2015 at 10:02, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 11-11-15 00:30, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On 9 November 2015 at 12:25, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> On 9 November 2015 at 00:22, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09-11-15 07:
Hi,
On 11-11-15 00:30, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 9 November 2015 at 12:25, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Hans,
On 9 November 2015 at 00:22, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09-11-15 07:48, Simon Glass wrote:
Each scan of the USB bus may return different results. Existing
driver-model
devices ar
Hi Hans,
On 9 November 2015 at 12:25, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 9 November 2015 at 00:22, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09-11-15 07:48, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
>>> Each scan of the USB bus may return different results. Existing
>>> driver-model
>>> devices are reused when found,
Hi Hans,
On 9 November 2015 at 00:22, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09-11-15 07:48, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Each scan of the USB bus may return different results. Existing
>> driver-model
>> devices are reused when found, but if a device no longer exists it will
>> stay
>> around, de-activat
Hi,
On 09-11-15 07:48, Simon Glass wrote:
Each scan of the USB bus may return different results. Existing driver-model
devices are reused when found, but if a device no longer exists it will stay
around, de-activated, but bound.
Detect these devices and remove them after the scan completes.
Si
Each scan of the USB bus may return different results. Existing driver-model
devices are reused when found, but if a device no longer exists it will stay
around, de-activated, but bound.
Detect these devices and remove them after the scan completes.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
Changes in v2:
12 matches
Mail list logo
