On 06/09/2017 12:41 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 April 2017 at 20:10, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Sometimes it is useful to iterate through all devices in a uclass and
>> skip over those which do not work correctly (e.g fail to probe). Add two
>> new functions to provide
On 06/09/2017 12:41 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 April 2017 at 20:10, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Sometimes it is useful to iterate through all devices in a uclass and
>> skip over those which do not work correctly (e.g fail to probe). Add two
>> new functions to provide
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 April 2017 at 20:10, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Sometimes it is useful to iterate through all devices in a uclass and
>> skip over those which do not work correctly (e.g fail to
Hi,
On 23 April 2017 at 20:10, Simon Glass wrote:
> Sometimes it is useful to iterate through all devices in a uclass and
> skip over those which do not work correctly (e.g fail to probe). Add two
> new functions to provide this feature.
>
> The caller must check the return
Sometimes it is useful to iterate through all devices in a uclass and
skip over those which do not work correctly (e.g fail to probe). Add two
new functions to provide this feature.
The caller must check the return value each time to make sure that the
device is valid. But the device pointer is
5 matches
Mail list logo