On Friday, March 28, 2014 at 09:26:50 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 23:37 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 27, 2014 at 11:05:21 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 22:01 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boo
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 23:37 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Thursday, March 27, 2014 at 11:05:21 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 22:01 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl-fel.lds
> > > > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl-fel.lds ne
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 at 11:05:21 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 22:01 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl-fel.lds
> > > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl-fel.lds new file mode 100644
> > > index 000..cf02300
> > > --- /dev
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 22:01 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl-fel.lds
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl-fel.lds new file mode 100644
> > index 000..cf02300
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/u-boot-spl-fel.lds
> This file i
On Friday, March 21, 2014 at 10:54:22 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i booting
> via FEL mode. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out
> to make the patch sizes more manageable.
>
> As well as the following signed-off
Hi,
On 03/22/2014 08:31 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Hans de Goede,
>
> In message <532da872.5000...@redhat.com> you wrote:
>>
>> No as said before the parts for which we don't have a Signed-off-by
>> for falls under b), since we took it from existing code which has clear
>> GPLv2+ license hea
Dear Hans de Goede,
In message <532da872.5000...@redhat.com> you wrote:
>
> No as said before the parts for which we don't have a Signed-off-by
> for falls under b), since we took it from existing code which has clear
> GPLv2+ license headers on each and every file.
Can the code be properly attr
Hi,
On 03/22/2014 01:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ian,
>
> In message <1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
>>
>>> What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines?
>>
>> I explained the process by which I arrived at these lists in 0/9. It
>> means tha
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 16:12 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/22/2014 01:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Ian,
> >
> > In message <1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> >>
> >>> What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines?
> >>
> >> I exp
Dear Ian,
In message <1395482650.2234.104.ca...@hastur.hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
>
> > What does that mean? I cannot find these names in the SoB lines?
>
> I explained the process by which I arrived at these lists in 0/9. It
> means that they appear as an author for a commit in the history in t
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 07:46 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ian Campbell,
>
> In message <1395438866-1193-5-git-send-email-...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> > This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i booting
> > via
> > FEL mode. These changes are not useful by themsel
Dear Ian Campbell,
In message <1395438866-1193-5-git-send-email-...@hellion.org.uk> you wrote:
> This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i booting via
> FEL mode. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make
> the patch sizes more manageable.
>
> A
This has been stripped back for mainlining and supports only sun7i booting via
FEL mode. These changes are not useful by themselves but are split out to make
the patch sizes more manageable.
As well as the following signed-off-by the sunxi branch shows commits to these
files authored by the follow
13 matches
Mail list logo
