Cosmetic change. Any call to the recover function would need to do the
same check afterwards, so it's sensible to make it part of the function.
Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno
---
Notes:
Changes since v1:
- Rebased on top of patch 1050650 ("i2c: rcar_i2c: Add Gen3 SoC support")
- Expla
On 3/5/19 12:23 PM, Ismael Luceno Cortes wrote:
> Cosmetic change. Any call to the recover function would need to do the
> same check afterwards, so it's sensible to make it part of the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Changes since v1:
> - Rebased on top of
On 05/Mar/2019 19:32, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 3/5/19 12:23 PM, Ismael Luceno Cortes wrote:
> > Cosmetic change. Any call to the recover function would need to do the
> > same check afterwards, so it's sensible to make it part of the function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno
> > ---
> >
> >
3 matches
Mail list logo