> On Jun 15, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> wrote:
> The correct way is to get cracking on the machine readable yaml based bindings
> and enforce it through there.
Machine readable bindings with enforcement would be enabling technology to solve
a lot of different problems (both technica
Hi David,
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 13:19 , David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:34:00PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>>> On Jun 15, 2016, at 06:14 , David Gibson
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:23PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi David,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:34:00PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > On Jun 15, 2016, at 06:14 , David Gibson
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:23PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>> On Jun 14, 2016, at 03:25 , David Gibson
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
Hi David,
> On Jun 15, 2016, at 06:14 , David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:23PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>> On Jun 14, 2016, at 03:25 , David Gibson
>>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> [snip]
> +static
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:23PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi David,
> > On Jun 14, 2016, at 03:25 , David Gibson
> > wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
[snip]
> >>> +static int fdt_overlay_merge(void *dt, void *dto)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int root,
Hi David,
> On Jun 14, 2016, at 03:25 , David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>> Hi Maxime,
>>
>>> On May 27, 2016, at 12:13 , Maxime Ripard
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
>>> boards
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> > On May 27, 2016, at 12:13 , Maxime Ripard
> > wrote:
> >
> > The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> > boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
> >
Hi Pantelis,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:28:11PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> > On May 27, 2016, at 12:13 , Maxime Ripard
> > wrote:
> >
> > The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> > boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism whe
Hi Maxime,
> On May 27, 2016, at 12:13 , Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
>
> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
> easily plug new board in (like the BBB, the Raspberry Pi or the CHIP).
>
> Add a n
On 2016-05-27 02:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
> boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
> easily plug new board in (like the BBB, the Raspberry Pi or the CHIP).
>
> Add a new function to merge overlay
The device tree overlays are a good way to deal with user-modifyable
boards or boards with some kind of an expansion mechanism where we can
easily plug new board in (like the BBB, the Raspberry Pi or the CHIP).
Add a new function to merge overlays with a base device tree.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ri
11 matches
Mail list logo
