On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 10:26 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> So, cam_enc_4xx (ARM) also fails to build with ELDK 5.2.1 (is fine with
> newer toolchains), so I dug into this patch to shrink things there. But
> looking above, are all of these right? It seems like generally we say
> OOBFREE=2, ECCPOS=56, ex
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:27:59PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> From: Prabhakar Kushwaha
>
> nand_ecclayout is present in mtd.h at Linux.
> Move this structure to mtd.h to comply with Linux.
>
> Also, increase the ecc placement locations to 640 to suport device having
> writesize/oobsize of 8KB/64
Hi Scott,
On 11/21/2013 06:27 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> From: Prabhakar Kushwaha
>
> nand_ecclayout is present in mtd.h at Linux.
> Move this structure to mtd.h to comply with Linux.
>
> Also, increase the ecc placement locations to 640 to suport device having
> writesize/oobsize of 8KB/640B. Thi
From: Prabhakar Kushwaha
nand_ecclayout is present in mtd.h at Linux.
Move this structure to mtd.h to comply with Linux.
Also, increase the ecc placement locations to 640 to suport device having
writesize/oobsize of 8KB/640B. This means that the maximum oobsize has gone
up to 640 bytes and conse
4 matches
Mail list logo
