Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 022/108] x86: timer: Use a separate flag for whether timer is inited

2019-11-02 Thread Bin Meng
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 3:12 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:39 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > At present the value of the timer base is used to determine whether the > > timer has been set up or not. It is true that the timer is essentially > > never exactly 0 when it is read. H

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 022/108] x86: timer: Use a separate flag for whether timer is inited

2019-10-28 Thread Bin Meng
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 11:39 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > At present the value of the timer base is used to determine whether the > timer has been set up or not. It is true that the timer is essentially > never exactly 0 when it is read. However 'time 0' may indicate the time > that the machine was

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 022/108] x86: timer: Use a separate flag for whether timer is inited

2019-10-21 Thread Park, Aiden
> -Original Message- > From: Simon Glass [mailto:s...@chromium.org] > Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2019 8:38 PM > To: U-Boot Mailing List > Cc: Bin Meng ; Simon Glass ; > Andy Shevchenko ; Bernhard Messerklinger > ; Park, Aiden > ; Simon Goldschmidt > ; Stefan Roese > Subject: [PATCH v3 022/

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 022/108] x86: timer: Use a separate flag for whether timer is inited

2019-10-20 Thread Simon Glass
At present the value of the timer base is used to determine whether the timer has been set up or not. It is true that the timer is essentially never exactly 0 when it is read. However 'time 0' may indicate the time that the machine was reset so it is useful to be able to denote that. Update the co