Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files > 2GB

2014-10-27 Thread Suriyan Ramasami
Hello Albert, On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Suriyan, > > On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:42:52 -0700, Suriyan Ramasami > wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files > 2GB > > Could you repost using the full 'negative' word instead of an > ab

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files > 2GB

2014-10-27 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hello Suriyan, On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:42:52 -0700, Suriyan Ramasami wrote: > Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files > 2GB Could you repost using the full 'negative' word instead of an abbreviation? Otherwise people looking for issues by keywords might miss this one. Amic

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/1] fs: fat/ext4/sandbox: Deal with files > 2GB

2014-10-26 Thread Suriyan Ramasami
The commands fatls/ext4ls give -ve values when dealing with files > 2GB. The commands fatsize/ext4size do not update the variable filesize for these files. To deal with this, the functions have been modified to take an additional parameter of type "* loff_t" which is then populated. The return val