On 25/04/2013 22:32, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>> Checking in the manual, I see that values in iomux-mx51.h are correct,
>> and they simply differs from the ones of MX6. We can simply add a #ifdef
>> CONFIG_MX51 in arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/iomux-v3.h to fix it, but
>> anyway I suppose that t
Hi Benoît,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> I am working on converting mx25/35/5x to imx-common iomux-v3. I have noticed
> in
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/iomux.c some "is_soc_rev(CHIP_REV_2_0)" that make this
> change quite complicated for mx51. There is no such thing in
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:32:50 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:27:12 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> > On 10/04/2013 21:32, feste...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Fabio Estevam
> > >
> > > Instead of having the same PAD control definition in each MX6
Hi Stefano,
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:27:12 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 10/04/2013 21:32, feste...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Fabio Estevam
> >
> > Instead of having the same PAD control definition in each MX6 variant pin
> > file,
> > place it into a common location.
> >
> > Signed-off-
On 10/04/2013 21:32, feste...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> Instead of having the same PAD control definition in each MX6 variant pin
> file,
> place it into a common location.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
Hi Fabio,
> Changes since v2:
> - None
> Changes since v1:
> -
From: Fabio Estevam
Instead of having the same PAD control definition in each MX6 variant pin file,
place it into a common location.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
---
Changes since v2:
- None
Changes since v1:
- Add missing IOMUX_CONFIG_SION definition to avoid breakage on mx6dl
arch/arm/inclu
6 matches
Mail list logo
