On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 06:08:52 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> Am 28.12.2015 um 16:52 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 04:48:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >> On 12/28/2015 09:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 12:17:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote
Am 28.12.2015 um 16:52 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 04:48:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
>> On 12/28/2015 09:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 12:17:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>> "lowlevel_init.S" can't be dropped.
>
> Thank
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 04:48:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> On 12/28/2015 09:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 12:17:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> "lowlevel_init.S" can't be dropped.
> >>>
> >>> Thank you very much for all the effort you put into i
On 12/28/2015 09:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 12:17:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
"lowlevel_init.S" can't be dropped.
Thank you very much for all the effort you put into investigating and
explaining why this SRAM area cannot be used ... not. From my side,
conside
On 12/28/2015 09:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 12:17:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
"lowlevel_init.S" can't be dropped.
Thank you very much for all the effort you put into investigating and
explaining why this SRAM area cannot be used ... not. From my side,
conside
On Monday, December 28, 2015 at 12:17:41 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
> >> "lowlevel_init.S" can't be dropped.
> >
> > Thank you very much for all the effort you put into investigating and
> > explaining why this SRAM area cannot be used ... not. From my side,
> > consider this patch to be NAKed.
>
On 12/27/2015 08:27 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 12:37:16 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 07:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 11:18:25 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:0
On 12/27/2015 07:37 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
Am 27.12.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 11:18:25 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 03:38 PM, Mar
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 12:37:16 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> On 12/27/2015 07:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 11:18:25 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >> On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
>
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 12:37:37 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> Am 27.12.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> > On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 11:18:25 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >> On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote
Am 27.12.2015 um 12:04 schrieb Marek Vasut:
> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 11:18:25 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
>> On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 03:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Sunday, December 2
On 12/27/2015 07:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 11:18:25 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 03:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 08:3
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 11:18:25 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >> On 12/27/2015 03:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 08:33:26 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
>
On 12/27/2015 06:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 03:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 08:33:26 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 02:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 07
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 09:07:36 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> On 12/27/2015 03:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 08:33:26 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >> On 12/27/2015 02:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 07:29:51 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >>>
On 12/27/2015 03:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 08:33:26 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/27/2015 02:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 07:29:51 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
WASP is ar9341.
Please do not top post.
Did you try if the memory is accessi
On Sunday, December 27, 2015 at 08:33:26 AM, Wills Wang wrote:
> On 12/27/2015 02:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 07:29:51 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >> WASP is ar9341.
> >
> > Please do not top post.
> >
> > Did you try if the memory is accessible on your platform ?
On 12/27/2015 02:37 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 07:29:51 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
WASP is ar9341.
Please do not top post.
Did you try if the memory is accessible on your platform ? AR9331 I have here
has the SRAM at 0xbd007000 , just like that machine in [1] .
I fo
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 07:29:51 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> WASP is ar9341.
Please do not top post.
Did you try if the memory is accessible on your platform ? AR9331 I have here
has the SRAM at 0xbd007000 , just like that machine in [1] .
> On 12/27/2015 02:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >
WASP is ar9341.
On 12/27/2015 02:17 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 06:35:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 04:48:57 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
The SPI flash is an IP block which just maps the SPI NOR into the
address space, it doesn't use
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 06:35:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 04:48:57 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > The SPI flash is an IP block which just maps the SPI NOR into the
> > > address space, it doesn't use the CPU cache at all.
> > >
> > > Maybe you
On Saturday, December 26, 2015 at 04:48:57 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
> > The SPI flash is an IP block which just maps the SPI NOR into the address
> > space, it doesn't use the CPU cache at all.
> >
> > Maybe you don't even need to lock cachelines though, the AR9331 should
> > have some intern
On 12/26/2015 02:02 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 12:38:39 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
On 12/24/2015 11:12 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 02:51:06 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
+LEAF(lowlevel_init)
+ /* These three WLAN_RESET will avoid original
On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 12:38:39 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> On 12/24/2015 11:12 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 02:51:06 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> +LEAF(lowlevel_init)
> + /* These three WLAN_RESET will avoid original issue */
> +
On 12/24/2015 11:12 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 02:51:06 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
+LEAF(lowlevel_init)
+ /* These three WLAN_RESET will avoid original issue */
+li t3, 0x03
+1:
+li t0, KSEG1ADDR(AR71XX_RESET_BASE)
+lw t1, AR933X_RE
On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 02:51:06 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
[...]
> >> +LEAF(lowlevel_init)
> >> + /* These three WLAN_RESET will avoid original issue */
> >> +li t3, 0x03
> >> +1:
> >> +li t0, KSEG1ADDR(AR71XX_RESET_BASE)
> >> +lw t1, AR933X_RESET_REG_RESET_MODU
On 12/24/2015 07:52 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 12:22:00 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
This patch enable work for ar933x SOC, tested on ar9331 board.
Signed-off-by: Wills Wang
[...]
diff --git a/arch/mips/config.mk b/arch/mips/config.mk
index 3ebc202..fd50909 100644
-
On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 12:22:00 PM, Wills Wang wrote:
> This patch enable work for ar933x SOC, tested on ar9331 board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wills Wang
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/mips/config.mk b/arch/mips/config.mk
> index 3ebc202..fd50909 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/config.mk
> +++ b/arch
This patch enable work for ar933x SOC, tested on ar9331 board.
Signed-off-by: Wills Wang
---
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None
arch/mips/Makefile |1 +
arch/mips/config.mk |1 +
arch/mips/mach-ath79/Makefile
29 matches
Mail list logo