Hi Philipp,
在 2018/12/27 下午10:31, Philipp Tomsich 写道:
David,
On 27.12.2018, at 13:49, David Wu wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I once submitted a series of patches that they can support all Socs' Pinctrl
and how do you feel about using them.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/868849/
Which reminds
Hi Christoph,
This patch seems is less of code about drive strength, for some modules,
like LCD, Ethernet is still needed.
在 2018/12/27 下午9:13, Christoph Müllner 写道:
Hi David,
On 12/27/18 1:49 PM, David Wu wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I once submitted a series of patches that they can support all
David,
> On 27.12.2018, at 13:49, David Wu wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> I once submitted a series of patches that they can support all Socs' Pinctrl
> and how do you feel about using them.
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/868849/
Which reminds me that I am still waiting for a newer revi
Hi David,
On 12/27/18 1:49 PM, David Wu wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> I once submitted a series of patches that they can support all Socs'
> Pinctrl and how do you feel about using them.
Thank's for pointing to that.
Your driver looks good, but I don't like the huge amount
of duplication in it (yo
Hi Christoph,
I once submitted a series of patches that they can support all Socs'
Pinctrl and how do you feel about using them.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/868849/
在 2018/12/27 上午9:11, Kever Yang 写道:
Add David to review the pinctrl driver.
Thanks,
- Kever
On 12/17/2018 09:30 PM, Chr
Add David to review the pinctrl driver.
Thanks,
- Kever
On 12/17/2018 09:30 PM, Christoph Muellner wrote:
> The current pinctrl driver for the RK3399 has a range of qulity issues.
> E.g. it only implements the .set_state_simple() callback, it
> does not parse the available pinctrl information fro
Hi Simon,
On 12/20/18 10:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 06:30, Christoph Muellner
> wrote:
>>
>> The current pinctrl driver for the RK3399 has a range of qulity issues.
>> E.g. it only implements the .set_state_simple() callback, it
>> does not parse the available pinctrl info
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 06:30, Christoph Muellner
wrote:
>
> The current pinctrl driver for the RK3399 has a range of qulity issues.
> E.g. it only implements the .set_state_simple() callback, it
> does not parse the available pinctrl information from the DTS
> (instead uses hardcoded values), is n
The current pinctrl driver for the RK3399 has a range of qulity issues.
E.g. it only implements the .set_state_simple() callback, it
does not parse the available pinctrl information from the DTS
(instead uses hardcoded values), is not flexible enough to cover
devices without 'interrupt' field in th
9 matches
Mail list logo
