This adds a default environment which should be able to support both
3.0.15 from Timesys and upcoming 3.11.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
---
Changes in v4:
- revert sys text address change (Alison)
- add mem=128M to bootargs/netargs (Andy)
Changes in v3:
- add dt boot support
- use ttyLP1 as c
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> This adds a default environment which should be able to support both
> 3.0.15 from Timesys and upcoming 3.11.
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - revert sys text address change (Alison)
> - add mem=128M to bootar
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
>> This adds a default environment which should be able to support both
>> 3.0.15 from Timesys and upcoming 3.11.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador
>> ---
>> Changes in v4:
>> -
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
>> Just curious: why do we need to pass mem=128M?
>
> Board fails to boot otherwise ... Andy did try it so he can explain it
> with more detail.
Hmm...Is DDR being incorrectly configured then? We need to understand
why this happens.
Andy,
> -Original Message-
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:feste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 10:15 AM
> To: Otavio Salvador
> Cc: Andy Voltz; U-Boot Mailing List; Estevam Fabio-R49496; Stefano
> Babic; Wang Huan-B18965
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2]
-R49496; Stefano
>> Babic; Wang Huan-B18965
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] vf610twr: Add default environment
>> in line with other Freescale boards
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Just curious: wh
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
> [Alison Wang] mem=128M is not needed with the latest kernel.
Thanks for confirming, Alison.
Could you please test Otavio's patch?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx
Hi Fabio,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:14:40PM -0400, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Otavio Salvador
> wrote:
>
> >> Just curious: why do we need to pass mem=128M?
> >
> > Board fails to boot otherwise ... Andy did try it so he can explain it
> > with more detail.
>
> Hm
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Andy Voltz wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:14:40PM -0400, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Just curious: why do we need to pass mem=128M?
>> >
>> > Board fails to boot otherwise ... Andy
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Andy Voltz wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:14:40PM -0400, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Otavio Salvador
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Just curious: why do we need to pass mem=128M?
>> >
>> > Board fails to boot otherwise ... Andy
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Andy Voltz wrote:
> It probably makes the most sense to just drop mem arg from the environment,
> and
> then we can patch our kernel to fix the memory setup issue.
Agreed, Andy.
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
___
U-Boot maili
11 matches
Mail list logo