Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/5] net: mvpp2: mark phy as invalid in case of missing appropriate driver

2019-11-29 Thread Joe Hershberger
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:09 PM wrote: > > From: Grzegorz Jaszczyk > > If the phy doesn't match with any existing u-boot drivers, the phy > framework will connect it to the generic one which uid == > 0x. In this case, act as if the phy wouldn't be declared in > dts. Otherwise, in case of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/5] net: mvpp2: mark phy as invalid in case of missing appropriate driver

2019-11-13 Thread Ramon Fried
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 1:09 AM wrote: > > From: Grzegorz Jaszczyk > > If the phy doesn't match with any existing u-boot drivers, the phy > framework will connect it to the generic one which uid == > 0x. In this case, act as if the phy wouldn't be declared in > dts. Otherwise, in case of

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/5] net: mvpp2: mark phy as invalid in case of missing appropriate driver

2019-08-15 Thread nhed+uboot
From: Grzegorz Jaszczyk If the phy doesn't match with any existing u-boot drivers, the phy framework will connect it to the generic one which uid == 0x. In this case, act as if the phy wouldn't be declared in dts. Otherwise, in case of 3310 (for which the driver doesn't exist) the link