[U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-19 Thread ying.zhang
From: Ying Zhang SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the autoconf.mk Makefile. As a result the build breaks when CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the board-specific include header file. With this, there is a possibility of having a CONFIG option defined in the header file bu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-19 Thread Scott Wood
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > From: Ying Zhang No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here. > SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the autoconf.mk > Makefile. > As a result the build breaks when CONFIG_SPL_BUIL

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > > From: Ying Zhang > > No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here. Indeed. > > SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-19 Thread York Sun
On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: >>> From: Ying Zhang >> >> No. You added one line AFAICT. Preserve the original author here. > > Indeed. > Do we need Yin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:20:25PM -0700, York Sun wrote: > On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > >>> From: Ying Zhang > >> > >> No. You added one line AFAIC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-19 Thread York Sun
On 08/19/2013 03:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:20:25PM -0700, York Sun wrote: >> On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 16:14 +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > From: Ying Zha

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-19 Thread Zhang Ying-B40530
>-Original Message- >From: sun york-R58495 >Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 5:20 AM >To: Tom Rini >Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Zhang Ying-B40530; Joel A Fernandes; u- >b...@lists.denx.de; sun york-R58495; Xie Xiaobo-R63061; Zhang Ying-B40530 >Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PA

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-20 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/19/2013 06:07 PM, York Sun wrote: > On 08/19/2013 03:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:20:25PM -0700, York Sun wrote: >>> On 08/19/2013 12:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:47:53PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] SPL: Makefile: Build a separate autoconf.mk for SPL

2013-08-20 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:14:14PM +0800, ying.zh...@freescale.com wrote: > From: Ying Zhang > > SPL defines CONFIG_SPL_BUILD but this does not percolate to the > autoconf.mk Makefile. As a result the build breaks when > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is used in the board-specific include header file. > With