Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/5] Build arch/$ARCH/lib/bootm.o depending on CONFIG_CMD_BOOTM

2013-06-20 Thread Dirk Eibach
2013/6/20 Dirk Eibach : > Hi Andy, > >>> From: Dirk Eibach >>> >>> MAKEALL is fine for ppc4xx and mpc85xx. >>> Run checks were done on our controlcenterd hardware. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach >>> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach >> >> >> You don't need two sign-offs. > > patman puts and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/5] Build arch/$ARCH/lib/bootm.o depending on CONFIG_CMD_BOOTM

2013-06-20 Thread Dirk Eibach
Hi Andy, >> From: Dirk Eibach >> >> MAKEALL is fine for ppc4xx and mpc85xx. >> Run checks were done on our controlcenterd hardware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach > > > You don't need two sign-offs. patman puts and additional SOB to some of my patches. I'm

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/5] Build arch/$ARCH/lib/bootm.o depending on CONFIG_CMD_BOOTM

2013-06-19 Thread Andy Fleming
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:08 AM, wrote: > From: Dirk Eibach > > MAKEALL is fine for ppc4xx and mpc85xx. > Run checks were done on our controlcenterd hardware. > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach > > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach > You don't need two sign-offs. Does anyone have comments on these pa

[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/5] Build arch/$ARCH/lib/bootm.o depending on CONFIG_CMD_BOOTM

2013-06-12 Thread dirk . eibach
From: Dirk Eibach MAKEALL is fine for ppc4xx and mpc85xx. Run checks were done on our controlcenterd hardware. Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach --- Changes in v6: None Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: - consider CONFIG_CMD_BOOTM for all architectures Changes in v3: No