> On 7 November 2016 at 02:21, Alison Wang wrote:
> >> On 11/04/2016 10:12 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 04/11/2016 17:08, york sun wrote:
> >> >> On 11/04/2016 09:53 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
> >> On 11/04/20
On 11/06/2016 06:21 PM, Alison Wang wrote:
>>
> [Alison Wang] Thanks for all your comments.
>
> For the issue about the tree would not be bisect-able, I have
> a solution. Actually it is the root cause that 64-bit kernel could not boot
> up when U-Boot is running in EL2. I will move these codes fro
Hi Alison,
On 7 November 2016 at 02:21, Alison Wang wrote:
>> On 11/04/2016 10:12 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 04/11/2016 17:08, york sun wrote:
>> >> On 11/04/2016 09:53 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
>> On 11/04/2016 09:32
> On 11/04/2016 10:12 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 04/11/2016 17:08, york sun wrote:
> >> On 11/04/2016 09:53 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
> On 11/04/2016 09:32 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Yes, with the attached pat
On 11/04/2016 09:53 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
>> On 11/04/2016 09:32 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
> Yes, with the attached patch on top of your original 2 patches,
> everything works again. I tested on FVP Foundation and AEMv8 models
> and Jun
On 11/04/2016 10:12 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2016 17:08, york sun wrote:
>> On 11/04/2016 09:53 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
On 11/04/2016 09:32 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, with the attached patch on top of your orig
On 11/04/2016 09:32 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, with the attached patch on top of your original 2 patches,
>>> everything works again. I tested on FVP Foundation and AEMv8 models
>>> and Juno R0, R1 and R2.
>>>
>>> I don't think it would be good to stack these three patches the way
>>> the
On 04/11/2016 17:08, york sun wrote:
On 11/04/2016 09:53 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
On 11/04/2016 09:32 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
Yes, with the attached patch on top of your original 2 patches,
everything works again. I tested on FVP Foundation and AEMv8
On 4 November 2016 at 15:53, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>
> On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
>>
>> On 11/04/2016 09:32 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>
>
> Yes, with the attached patch on top of your original 2 patches,
> everything works again. I tested on FVP Foundation and AEMv8 model
On 04/11/2016 16:43, york sun wrote:
On 11/04/2016 09:32 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
Yes, with the attached patch on top of your original 2 patches,
everything works again. I tested on FVP Foundation and AEMv8 models
and Juno R0, R1 and R2.
I don't think it would be good to stack these three pat
> On 4 November 2016 at 02:26, Alison Wang wrote:
> > York,
> >
> >
> >
> > No, he don’t have my 32-bit kernel image. I am not
> > sure he is using 32-bit kernel or 64-bit kernel.
> >
> >
> >
> > Ryan,
> >
> >
> >
> > I am not familiar with the boards you tested,
>
On 11/04/2016 05:34 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> On 4 November 2016 at 09:20, Alison Wang wrote:
>>> On 4 November 2016 at 02:26, Alison Wang wrote:
York,
No, he don’t have my 32-bit kernel image. I am not
sure he is using 32-bit kernel or 64-bit kernel.
On 4 November 2016 at 15:08, york sun wrote:
> On 11/04/2016 05:34 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> On 4 November 2016 at 09:20, Alison Wang wrote:
On 4 November 2016 at 02:26, Alison Wang wrote:
> York,
>
>
>
> No, he don’t have my 32-bit kernel image. I am not
On 4 November 2016 at 09:20, Alison Wang wrote:
>> On 4 November 2016 at 02:26, Alison Wang wrote:
>> > York,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > No, he don’t have my 32-bit kernel image. I am not
>> > sure he is using 32-bit kernel or 64-bit kernel.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ryan,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
On 4 November 2016 at 02:26, Alison Wang wrote:
> York,
>
>
>
> No, he don’t have my 32-bit kernel image. I am not sure he
> is using 32-bit kernel or 64-bit kernel.
>
>
>
> Ryan,
>
>
>
> I am not familiar with the boards you tested,
The FVP Foundation model is fre
Alison,
Does Ryan have your 32-bit kernel image? I think kernel 32-bit doesn't support
spin table. Please work with Ryan if your PSCI patch is required for the test.
York
Original Message
From: Ryan Harkin
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 12:17 PM
To: york sun
Subject: Re:
York,
No, he don’t have my 32-bit kernel image. I am not sure he is
using 32-bit kernel or 64-bit kernel.
Ryan,
I am not familiar with the boards you tested, so I have some
questions, please help to work with me to find the root cause.
1. Are you loading
Hi York/Alison,
Sorry for not having had time to look at this earlier.
On 26 October 2016 at 17:54, york sun wrote:
> On 10/07/2016 11:56 PM, Alison Wang wrote:
>> To support loading a 32-bit OS, the execution state will change from
>> AArch64 to AArch32 when jumping to kernel.
>>
>> The archit
On 10/07/2016 11:56 PM, Alison Wang wrote:
> To support loading a 32-bit OS, the execution state will change from
> AArch64 to AArch32 when jumping to kernel.
>
> The architecture information will be got through checking FIT image,
> then U-Boot will load 32-bit OS or 64-bit OS automatically.
>
> S
To support loading a 32-bit OS, the execution state will change from
AArch64 to AArch32 when jumping to kernel.
The architecture information will be got through checking FIT image,
then U-Boot will load 32-bit OS or 64-bit OS automatically.
Signed-off-by: Ebony Zhu
Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
Si
20 matches
Mail list logo
