This patchset adds support for TPL(Tertiary Program Loader) and P1021MDS board.
It is a rework of patchset at
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-December/082881.html,
addresses the comments from the list and is based on the top of the tree.
It needs to be applied after patch
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:39:51 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear haiying.w...@freescale.com,
In message 1296499317-26616-1-git-send-email-haiying.w...@freescale.com you
wrote:
This patchset adds support for TPL(Tertiary Program Loader) and P1021MDS
board.
It is a rework of
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110131141332.5a4a2...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
I think these patches are incorrectly split.
I think the intent was to split the arch-neutral stuff from the 85xx
stuff from the board stuff -- you'd rather they be all bunched together?
No, of
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110131143141.2959d...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
I'm confused. You say of course not all together, but the first one
you say to include with the second, and the second you say to include
with the third.
I did not say this.
If you're suggesting
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message c6334d93-a826-4c68-9477-2baeee681...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
...
I'm in agreement with Scott on this. I believe we've taken this a bit
too far about dead code. It should be reasonable in a patch series to
have code that will be used in a subsequent patch.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:50:57 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110131143141.2959d...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
I'm confused. You say of course not all together, but the first one
you say to include with the second, and the second you
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:34:34 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110131151506.700dd...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
For example, why must we add the Makefile changes in the first step,
when all the code it references is still missing?
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110131160713.0b78c...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
Do you want the README changes to be a separate patch from the
board/makefile changes?
Did you not just explain that this would make no sense?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:40:41 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110131160713.0b78c...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
Do you want the README changes to be a separate patch from the
board/makefile changes?
Did you not just explain that this
I've published some related cleanup patches and push those patches into
u-boot-85xx.git 'dev' branch.
You should be able to:
* drop board_lmb_reserve()
* remove config.mk and CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT in config.h
* remove fsl_ddr_get_mem_data_rate(), fsl_ddr_get_spd() [need to rename
10 matches
Mail list logo
