> From: Ang, Chee Hong
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 11:00
> To: Lars Povlsen - M31675 ;
> tr...@konsulko.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; macro.wav...@gmail.com;
> albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; york@nxp.com
> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARMv8: PSCI: Fix PSCI_TABLE relocation issue
>
> On Mon, 2019-0
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 07:27 +, lars.povl...@microchip.com wrote:
> >
> > From: Ang, Chee Hong
> > Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 05:10
> > To: Lars Povlsen - M31675 ;
> > tr...@konsulko.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; macro.wav...@gmail.com;
> > albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; york@nxp.com
> > Subject
> From: Ang, Chee Hong
> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 05:10
> To: Lars Povlsen - M31675 ;
> tr...@konsulko.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; macro.wav...@gmail.com;
> albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; york@nxp.com
> Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARMv8: PSCI: Fix PSCI_TABLE relocation issue
>
> On Thu, 2019-04
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 14:38 +0200, Lars Povlsen wrote:
> This fixes relaction isses with the PSCI_TABLE entries in
> the psci_32_table and psci_64_table.
>
> When using 32-bit adress pointers relocation was not being applied to
> the tables, causing PSCI handlers to point to the un-relocated code
This fixes relaction isses with the PSCI_TABLE entries in
the psci_32_table and psci_64_table.
When using 32-bit adress pointers relocation was not being applied to
the tables, causing PSCI handlers to point to the un-relocated code
area. By using 64-bit data relocation is properly applied. The
ha
5 matches
Mail list logo
