Dear Tom,
In message <20140506183303.GY22182@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>
> Perhaps a compromise here is to throw lots of MAINTAINERS files around
> and whack get_maintainers.pl to loop over all 'MAINTAINERS' files rather
> than the single top level one? That way we can get human understandable
>
On 05/06/2014 12:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
...
> An issue with a single top-level MAINTAINERS file is that we'll get
> conflicts galore. What a MAINTAINERS file would give us is
> get_maintainers.pl from the kernel which can be helpful.
The conflicts we'll get are likely to be quite trivial to resol
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 06:58:55PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Before I send Kconfig series v2,
> please let me cofirm our approach of maintainers info.
>
>
> When I posted the RFC series in March, I put
> maintainers info and board status
> into defconfig of each board.
> But this
Dear Andreas,
In message <5360e3ed.9090...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> But I also think we need something like the MAINTAINERS approach sent by
> Daniel. It maybe won't scale for boards but I think it is a better
> solution than the Wiki page. It allows fine grained allocation of
> responsibility f
Hi all,
On 04/30/2014 07:31 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:41:07 +0200
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In message <20140428185854.b2b8.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com> you wrote:
>>>
>>> Before I send Kconfig series v2,
>>> please let me cofirm our approach of maintainers info.
>>
>> Tha
Hi Wolfgang,
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 22:41:07 +0200
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Masahiro,
>
> In message <20140428185854.b2b8.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com> you wrote:
> >
> > Before I send Kconfig series v2,
> > please let me cofirm our approach of maintainers info.
>
> Thanks for all your patience
Dear Masahiro,
In message <20140428185854.b2b8.aa925...@jp.panasonic.com> you wrote:
>
> Before I send Kconfig series v2,
> please let me cofirm our approach of maintainers info.
Thanks for all your patience when dealing with all these apparently
simple things that nevertheless take so much time
Hi.
Before I send Kconfig series v2,
please let me cofirm our approach of maintainers info.
When I posted the RFC series in March, I put
maintainers info and board status
into defconfig of each board.
But this idea was rejected.
Instead, MAINTAINERS file as in Linux Kernel was proposed.
(And th
8 matches
Mail list logo
