Re: [U-Boot] [RFC 4/4] MXC: Reorganize 16 bit nand detection.

Scott Wood skrev: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Magnus Lilja wrote: >> Alternative solution for supporting 16 bit NAND detection for the >> i.MX27 and i.MX31 SoCs. This moves the SoC specific code to the SoC header >> file leaving mxc_nand.c free from #ifdef's (in this respect). > >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC 4/4] MXC: Reorganize 16 bit nand detection.

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Magnus Lilja wrote: > Alternative solution for supporting 16 bit NAND detection for the > i.MX27 and i.MX31 SoCs. This moves the SoC specific code to the SoC header > file leaving mxc_nand.c free from #ifdef's (in this respect). OTOH, it moves more NAND st

[U-Boot] [RFC 4/4] MXC: Reorganize 16 bit nand detection.

Alternative solution for supporting 16 bit NAND detection for the i.MX27 and i.MX31 SoCs. This moves the SoC specific code to the SoC header file leaving mxc_nand.c free from #ifdef's (in this respect). Question: Is this approach acceptable/preferred over having #ifdef's for different SoCs in mxc_