Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] drivers/usb: regorganisation

2009-04-02 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello Jean-Christophe, >> usb_[eo]hci => [eo]hci ? >> > Remy what do you prefer? I think this structure is a whole lot better then dumping everything in a flat directory tree. And I also prefer to follow the Linux kernel structure, thus without usb_ prefixes. e.g.: drivers/usb/host/ochi.c or dri

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] drivers/usb: regorganisation

2009-04-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 13:21:19 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > drivers/usb/{ => gadget}/Makefile| 19 +-- > drivers/usb/{ => gadget}/usbdcore_ep0.c |2 +- > drivers/usb/{ => gadget}/usbdcore_mpc8xx.c |4 ++-- > drivers/usb/{ => gadget}/us

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] drivers/usb: regorganisation

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 00:12 Thu 02 Apr , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <1238606479-914-1-git-send-email-plagn...@jcrosoft.com> you wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > --- > > better description will be wrote for the final patch > > Maybe

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] drivers/usb: regorganisation

2009-04-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <1238606479-914-1-git-send-email-plagn...@jcrosoft.com> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > --- > better description will be wrote for the final patch Maybe we should then remove some redundancy in the file names, too?

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] drivers/usb: regorganisation

2009-04-01 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- better description will be wrote for the final patch Best Regards, J. Makefile |4 +++- drivers/usb/{ => core}/Makefile | 22 +- drivers/usb/{ => core}/usb_ehci_core.c