Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/12] RFC: dm: Add I2C support

2014-11-11 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Heiko, On 10 November 2014 00:16, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Simon, > > sorry for the long delay... > > Am 13.10.2014 07:39, schrieb Simon Glass: >> >> (Note this is RFC since the uclass interface needs discussion and also >> because only sandbox is implemented so far. But I thought it best

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/12] RFC: dm: Add I2C support

2014-11-09 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Simon, sorry for the long delay... Am 13.10.2014 07:39, schrieb Simon Glass: (Note this is RFC since the uclass interface needs discussion and also because only sandbox is implemented so far. But I thought it best to get this out there as soon as I wrote it as it may influence the PMIC li

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/12] RFC: dm: Add I2C support

2014-10-29 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Tom, Am 24.10.2014 17:03, schrieb Tom Rini: On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:39:26PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: (Note this is RFC since the uclass interface needs discussion and also because only sandbox is implemented so far. But I thought it best to get this out there as soon as I wrote it as

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/12] RFC: dm: Add I2C support

2014-10-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:39:26PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > (Note this is RFC since the uclass interface needs discussion and also > because only sandbox is implemented so far. But I thought it best to get > this out there as soon as I wrote it as it may influence the PMIC library, > etc.) > >

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/12] RFC: dm: Add I2C support

2014-10-12 Thread Simon Glass
(Note this is RFC since the uclass interface needs discussion and also because only sandbox is implemented so far. But I thought it best to get this out there as soon as I wrote it as it may influence the PMIC library, etc.) This series is an initial attempt to add I2C support to driver model. It