Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: rk3399: enable SPL with ATF support

2017-01-05 Thread Kever Yang
Hi Michal, On 01/02/2017 11:05 PM, Michal Simek wrote: Hi, separation of rk3399 SPL from ATF SPL would be worth. Thanks for your comment, this may help my rk3399 SPL patches get accept faster. I will do it after people get back from holiday and send me other comments. Thanks, - Kever

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: rk3399: enable SPL with ATF support

2017-01-02 Thread Michal Simek
Hi, separation of rk3399 SPL from ATF SPL would be worth. Thanks, Michal On 29.12.2016 11:25, Kever Yang wrote: > > RK3399 SPL is not enable bacause of the lack of ATF support in SPL, > after port some source code from ATF, I manage to enable the support for > ATF in SPL. This patch set

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/3] arm64: rk3399: enable SPL with ATF support

2016-12-29 Thread Kever Yang
RK3399 SPL is not enable bacause of the lack of ATF support in SPL, after port some source code from ATF, I manage to enable the support for ATF in SPL. This patch set depends on some patch for SPL support multi binary in FIT which is from Andre. The patch of sdram controller is still not clean,