Hi Michal,
On 01/02/2017 11:05 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
separation of rk3399 SPL from ATF SPL would be worth.
Thanks for your comment, this may help my rk3399 SPL patches get accept
faster.
I will do it after people get back from holiday and send me other comments.
Thanks,
- Kever
Tha
Hi,
separation of rk3399 SPL from ATF SPL would be worth.
Thanks,
Michal
On 29.12.2016 11:25, Kever Yang wrote:
>
> RK3399 SPL is not enable bacause of the lack of ATF support in SPL,
> after port some source code from ATF, I manage to enable the support for
> ATF in SPL. This patch set depends
RK3399 SPL is not enable bacause of the lack of ATF support in SPL,
after port some source code from ATF, I manage to enable the support for
ATF in SPL. This patch set depends on some patch for SPL support multi
binary in FIT which is from Andre.
The patch of sdram controller is still not clean,
3 matches
Mail list logo