On 11/25/2016 04:56 PM, Tomas Melin wrote:
>
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> On 11/24/2016 03:55 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Hi Tomas,
>>
>> On 11/23/2016 10:04 PM, Tomas Melin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have successfully been using this patch to fix the problem mentioned in
>>> the
>>> original message.
Hi Jaehoon,
On 11/24/2016 03:55 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> On 11/23/2016 10:04 PM, Tomas Melin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have successfully been using this patch to fix the problem mentioned in
>> the
>> original message. Could this be picked up upstream?
>
> Sorry. I didn't see
Hi Tomas,
On 11/23/2016 10:04 PM, Tomas Melin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have successfully been using this patch to fix the problem mentioned in the
> original message. Could this be picked up upstream?
Sorry. I didn't see this patch..Could you again send the patch without RFC?
Then it's helpful to me
Hi,
We have successfully been using this patch to fix the problem mentioned in the
original message. Could this be picked up upstream?
BR,
Tomas
On Wed Feb 5 21:00:42 CET 2014, Frank Bormann wrote:
>Hello Everyone,
>
>I believe, there is a bug in the mmc driver code pertaining to how u-boot
Hello Everyone,
I believe, there is a bug in the mmc driver code pertaining to how u-boot
detects memory size of an mmc device. However, I am not 100% sure, my solution
conforms to the JEDEC standard. So I am putting it up for discussion.
Previously, sector count indicated by mmc devices in
5 matches
Mail list logo