Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] hashtable: drop all non-reentrant versions

2010-12-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message <1291807565-4831-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote: > The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a single > shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these funcs for > two different purposes, they'll cause problems for

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] hashtable: drop all non-reentrant versions

2010-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 07:31:54 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 06:26:04 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a > > > single shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these > > > funcs for two

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] hashtable: drop all non-reentrant versions

2010-12-08 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Wolfgang Denk wrote on 2010/12/08 15:23:17: > > Dear Joakim Tjernlund, > > In message > you > wrote: > > > > > oh, and this does shrink the final u-boot a little, so that's good > > > -mike > > > > Nice, over the last years I have noticed that u-boot has grown a lot. > > I had to disable a few

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] hashtable: drop all non-reentrant versions

2010-12-08 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message you wrote: > > > oh, and this does shrink the final u-boot a little, so that's good > > -mike > > Nice, over the last years I have noticed that u-boot has grown a lot. > I had to disable a few non essential commands to make it it fit. > > Does anyone else sha

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] hashtable: drop all non-reentrant versions

2010-12-08 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
> > On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 06:26:04 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a single > > shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these funcs for > > two different purposes, they'll cause problems for the other. > > > > Avoi

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] hashtable: drop all non-reentrant versions

2010-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 06:26:04 Mike Frysinger wrote: > The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a single > shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these funcs for > two different purposes, they'll cause problems for the other. > > Avoid this by con

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] hashtable: drop all non-reentrant versions

2010-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
The non-reentrant versions of the hashtable functions operate on a single shared hashtable. So if two different people try using these funcs for two different purposes, they'll cause problems for the other. Avoid this by converting all existing hashtable consumers over to the reentrant versions a