[ane...@ti.com:
1. Changed the definition of OBJTREE and the way 'obj' is defined.
2. Defined a flag to identify regular U-Boot build
3. Taking care of autoconf.mk etc for SPL due to changed OBJTREE
]
[daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com:
1. reverted changes on implicite make rules
2. readded defini
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:26:19 Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> +ifdef CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD
> +# OBJTREE points to /spl/obj inside the original OBJTREE for SPL
> +sinclude $(OBJTREE)/../../include/autoconf.mk
> +sinclude $(OBJTREE)/../../include/config.mk
> +else
> sinclude $(OBJTREE)/include/aut
Hi Daniel,
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 09:56 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
> [ane...@ti.com:
> 1. Changed the definition of OBJTREE and the way 'obj' is defined.
> 2. Defined a flag to identify regular U-Boot build
> 3. Taking care of autoconf.mk etc for SPL due to changed OBJTREE
> ]
>
> [daniel.schw
Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
In message
<1309883182-12854-2-git-send-email-daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com> you wrote:
> [ane...@ti.com:
> 1. Changed the definition of OBJTREE and the way 'obj' is defined.
> 2. Defined a flag to identify regular U-Boot build
> 3. Taking care of autoconf.mk etc for
Dear Wolfgang,
On Friday 08 July 2011 02:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
>
> In
> message<1309883182-12854-2-git-send-email-daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com>
> you wrote:
>> [ane...@ti.com:
>> 1. Changed the definition of OBJTREE and the way 'obj' is defined.
>> 2. Defin
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4e16d9da.4080...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> >> +CONFIG_NORMAL_UBOOT = $(if $(CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD),,y)
> >
> > Is this not redundant, then?
>
> Yes, it is. But it was handy for conditional inclusion of source files
> in the Makefiles, like this:
>
> +# used only by norm
Dear Wolfgang,
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
>
> In message
> <1309883182-12854-2-git-send-email-daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com> you
> wrote:
>> [ane...@ti.com:
>> 1. Changed the definition of OBJTREE and the way 'obj' is defined.
>> 2. Defi
On Friday 08 July 2011 04:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4e16d9da.4080...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>
+CONFIG_NORMAL_UBOOT = $(if $(CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD),,y)
>>>
>>> Is this not redundant, then?
>>
>> Yes, it is. But it was handy for conditional inclusion of source fi
Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
In message
you wrote:
>
> >> +# Allow compiling of C and ASM code parts in different way.
> >> +# Serves also as a replacement for CONFIG_PRELOADER.
> >> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD),)
> >> +CPPFLAGS += -DCONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD
> >> +endif
> >
> > I don't understan
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4e16ecb6.5070...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> >> Without CONFIG_NORMAL_UBOOT this becomes a little cumbersome.
> >
> > Hm... instead of
> >
> > COBJS-$(CONFIG_NORMAL_UBOOT) += fileA.o
> >
> > we could use
> >
> > COBJS-$(if $(CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD),,y)
>
> This is what I was
Dear Wolfgang,
On Friday 08 July 2011 05:55 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
>
> In
> message
> you wrote:
>>
+# Allow compiling of C and ASM code parts in different way.
+# Serves also as a replacement for CONFIG_PRELOADER.
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD),)
Dear Aneesh V,
In message <4e17070e.50...@ti.com> you wrote:
>
> Do you confirm on replacing all instances of CONFIG_PRELOADER with
> CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD?
Well, both are just names. CONFIG_PRELOADER is shorter, but we are
moving more and more to the "spl" names, so maybe we can agree on
On Friday 08 July 2011 07:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>
> In message<4e17070e.50...@ti.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Do you confirm on replacing all instances of CONFIG_PRELOADER with
>> CONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD?
>
> Well, both are just names. CONFIG_PRELOADER is shorter, but we are
> movi
13 matches
Mail list logo
