Dear Chris,
In message <50fbb7ea.10...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> The POSIX solution for this is to use sockaddr which encompasses both v4
> and v6 addresses (as well as other socket types). Do we want to add a
> wrapper type or just work with void *?
Without checking for implications for the impl
Dear Chris,
In message
you wrote:
>
> RFC5970[1] details network boot options for DHCPv6 (I think it's the
> ratified version of the draft you linked to). Basically this allows the
> server to specify a URL for the boot file which presumably could be
> something like tftp://[2001:db8::1]/uImage.
Hi Wolfgang,
A a few more specific answers to your questions
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 01/18/2013 11:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Chris,
> >
> > Last time I checked (about 2 years ago) there was no officially
> > agreed-on standard for example how networ
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:44:39 +1300, Chris Packham
> wrote:
>
> > TFTP over IPv6 as well as PING6. Our use case is just static address
> > configuration but using link-local addresses should be doable. I was
> > thinking it wo
Hi Chris,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:44:39 +1300, Chris Packham
wrote:
> TFTP over IPv6 as well as PING6. Our use case is just static address
> configuration but using link-local addresses should be doable. I was
> thinking it wouldn't be to hard to implement something to generate a
> global IPv6 ad
On 01/19/2013 07:41 AM, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Chris,
>>
>> In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>> Personally I'm happy to have a long running series and periodically send
>>> updates to the list. I have a repository o
On 01/18/2013 11:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chris,
>
> In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> Good question. Basically we have some out of tree code that implements a
>> basic IPv6 stack. I'm drip feeding the code in pieces to avoid just
>> dumping it on people and becaus
On 01/18/2013 11:23 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chris,
>
> In message <1358472932-32083-1-git-send-email-judge.pack...@gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>>
>> This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
>> printing/parsing of addresses. I have a patch for testing these basic
>> things
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Chris,
>
> In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>> Personally I'm happy to have a long running series and periodically send
>> updates to the list. I have a repository on github[1] which has an ipv6
>> branch collecting my
Dear Chris,
In message <50f91851.5050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Good question. Basically we have some out of tree code that implements a
> basic IPv6 stack. I'm drip feeding the code in pieces to avoid just
> dumping it on people and because the current code wouldn't meet u-boot's
> standards.
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <20130118092041.0c827374@lilith> you wrote:
>
> > This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
> > printing/parsing of addresses.
>
> As a general comment, I heartily welcome IPv6 support (even though I
Me too! :-)
> but I wonder how this fits
Dear Chris,
In message <1358472932-32083-1-git-send-email-judge.pack...@gmail.com> you
wrote:
>
> This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
> printing/parsing of addresses. I have a patch for testing these basic
> things which I haven't included in this series yet. Is there a
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:39:29PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> Putting my IPv6 promoter hat on I hope that it won't stay dead for long :)
>From my side, IPv6 is long awaited feature by me and various people,
so it won't stay dead.
___
U-Boot mailing l
On 01/18/2013 09:20 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:27 +1300, Chris Packham
> wrote:
>
>> From: Chris Packham
>>
>> This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
>> printing/parsing of addresses.
>
> As a general comment, I heartily welcome I
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:27 +1300, Chris Packham
wrote:
> From: Chris Packham
>
> This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
> printing/parsing of addresses.
As a general comment, I heartily welcome IPv6 support (even though I
suspect there is quite a lot to be d
From: Chris Packham
This series so far covers the introduction of a IP6addr_t and
printing/parsing of addresses. I have a patch for testing these basic
things which I haven't included in this series yet. Is there a unittest
facility for u-boot I should be using?
A few open questions
1) Presumab
16 matches
Mail list logo
