On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Joe Hershberger
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
>> Previously values greater than 255 were implicitly truncated. Add some
>> stricter checking to reject addresses with components
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
> Previously values greater than 255 were implicitly truncated. Add some
> stricter checking to reject addresses with components >255.
>
> With the input "1234192.168.1.1" the old behaviour would truncate the
> address
Previously values greater than 255 were implicitly truncated. Add some
stricter checking to reject addresses with components >255.
With the input "1234192.168.1.1" the old behaviour would truncate the
address to 192.168.1.1. New behaviour rejects the string outright and
returns 0.0.0.0, which for
3 matches
Mail list logo