Simon,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 02:06:56PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:12:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Do you have
Hi Jason,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Simon,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 02:06:56PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jason,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:12:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On
Simon,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 02:06:56PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Added the remote,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:04:23PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
This new option allows U-Boot to embed a binary device tree into its image
to allow run-time control of peripherals. This device tree is for U-Boot's
own use and is not necessarily the same one as is passed to the kernel.
The
Hi Jason,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Simon,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 02:06:56PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Tue, Sep
Hi Grant,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:04:23PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
This new option allows U-Boot to embed a binary device tree into its image
to allow run-time control of peripherals. This device tree is for
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
if the fdt is not in the U-Boot tree, where does it go? When will the
kernel fdt be set up? That sounds very promising.
Into a separate git tree. Possibly on devicetree.org,
git.secretlab.ca, or git.linaro.org. I don't
Hi Grant.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
if the fdt is not in the U-Boot tree, where does it go? When will the
kernel fdt be set up? That sounds very promising.
Into a
Simon,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:45:59AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:47:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at
Hi Jason,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Simon,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:45:59AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
5.) run, then 'date' fails like so:
find_alias_node: rtc0
fdt_decode_next_alias failed.
Error decoding fdt for mvrtc.
## Get
Dear Grant Likely,
In message 20110914164528.gm3...@ponder.secretlab.ca you wrote:
May I suggest an alternate approach? Rather than hard linking the dtb
into the u-boot image, this would be so much more useful if the dtb
can be concatenated to the u-boot binary so that it can be configured
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:05:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:45:59AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
5.) run, then 'date' fails like so:
find_alias_node: rtc0
fdt_decode_next_alias
Hi Jason,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:05:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:45:59AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
[snip]
5.) run,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Grant Likely,
In message 20110914164528.gm3...@ponder.secretlab.ca you wrote:
May I suggest an alternate approach? Rather than hard linking the dtb
into the u-boot image, this would be so much more useful if the dtb
Simon,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:24:31PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:05:58PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
...
Yes, ideally I would like to keep SOC-specific things out of it at
this stage, but I was
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Grant Likely,
In message 20110914164528.gm3...@ponder.secretlab.ca you wrote:
May I suggest an alternate approach? Rather than hard linking the dtb
into the u-boot image, this would be so much more useful if the dtb
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:12:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Do you have a git tree up that I could base off of? git.chromium.org's
version of u-boot doesn't seem to have your code...
You probably need to look at a
Hi Jason,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:12:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Do you have a git tree up that I could base off of? git.chromium.org's
version of
This new option allows U-Boot to embed a binary device tree into its image
to allow run-time control of peripherals. This device tree is for U-Boot's
own use and is not necessarily the same one as is passed to the kernel.
The device tree compiler output should be placed in the $(obj)
rooted tree.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:04:23PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
This device tree is for U-Boot's own use and is not necessarily the
same one as is passed to the kernel.
Are there plans to keepup with being able to use a kernel generated fdt?
eg effectively ignoring things we don't care about like
Hi Jason,
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jason u-b...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:04:23PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
This device tree is for U-Boot's own use and is not necessarily the
same one as is passed to the kernel.
Are there plans to keepup with being able to use
21 matches
Mail list logo
