Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > Hi Joe! > > Thanks for chiming in, especially seeing that you have previously worked > on something very similar. Sure! Sorry I didn't review this sooner. > Am 27.11.2016 um 19:53 schrieb Joe Hershberger: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

Hi Joe! Thanks for chiming in, especially seeing that you have previously worked on something very similar. Am 27.11.2016 um 19:53 schrieb Joe Hershberger: On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: "transient" (='t') is like "any", but requests that a variable should not be ex

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > "transient" (='t') is like "any", but requests that a variable > should not be exported (ENV_FLAGS_VARACCESS_PREVENT_EXPORT). > > "system" (='S') is meant for 'internal' variables that The flags are positional, so 's' is not in use. It s

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

On 25 November 2016 at 03:48, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Am 23.11.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Simon Glass: >> >> Hi Bernhard, >> >> [...] >> Well you could add a separate patch before this one which renames >> everything. I don't think anyone else is working in this area. >> >> Regards, >>

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

Hi Simon, Am 23.11.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Simon Glass: Hi Bernhard, [...] Well you could add a separate patch before this one which renames everything. I don't think anyone else is working in this area. Regards, Simon Doing so, I have arrived at the (additional) commit attached below. With th

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

Hi Bernhard, On 22 November 2016 at 11:54, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > Hi Simon! > > Am 19.11.2016 um 14:47 schrieb Simon Glass: >> >> Hi Bernhard, >> >> On 16 November 2016 at 03:29, Bernhard Nortmann >> wrote: >>> >>> "transient" (='t') is like "any", but requests that a variable >>> should not

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

Hi Simon! Am 19.11.2016 um 14:47 schrieb Simon Glass: Hi Bernhard, On 16 November 2016 at 03:29, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: "transient" (='t') is like "any", but requests that a variable should not be exported (ENV_FLAGS_VARACCESS_PREVENT_EXPORT). "system" (='S') is meant for 'internal' variab

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

Hi Bernhard, On 16 November 2016 at 03:29, Bernhard Nortmann wrote: > "transient" (='t') is like "any", but requests that a variable > should not be exported (ENV_FLAGS_VARACCESS_PREVENT_EXPORT). > > "system" (='S') is meant for 'internal' variables that > aren't supposed to be changed by the use

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] env: Introduce "transient" and "system" access flags

"transient" (='t') is like "any", but requests that a variable should not be exported (ENV_FLAGS_VARACCESS_PREVENT_EXPORT). "system" (='S') is meant for 'internal' variables that aren't supposed to be changed by the user. It corresponds to "transient" plus "read-only". Signed-off-by: Bernhard Nor