Hi Joe,
On 16 February 2015 at 21:17, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On 13 February 2015 at 19:33, Joe Hershberger
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Joe,
>> >>
>>
Hi Simon,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 13 February 2015 at 19:33, Joe Hershberger
wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Joe,
> >>
> >> On 10 February 2015 at 23:08, Joe Hershberger <
joe.hershber...@gmail.com>
> >>
Hi Joe,
On 13 February 2015 at 19:33, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On 10 February 2015 at 23:08, Joe Hershberger
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Simon,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Joe,
>> >
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 10 February 2015 at 23:08, Joe Hershberger
wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Joe,
> >>
> >> On 10 February 2015 at 18:30, Joe Hershberger
> >> wrote:
> >> > Befor
Hi Joe,
On 10 February 2015 at 23:08, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On 10 February 2015 at 18:30, Joe Hershberger
>> wrote:
>> > Before this patch, if the sequence numbers were resolved before probe,
>> > this cod
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> On 10 February 2015 at 18:30, Joe Hershberger
wrote:
> > Before this patch, if the sequence numbers were resolved before probe,
> > this code would insist on defining new non-conflicting-with-itself seq
> > numbers. N
Hi Joe,
On 10 February 2015 at 18:30, Joe Hershberger wrote:
> Before this patch, if the sequence numbers were resolved before probe,
> this code would insist on defining new non-conflicting-with-itself seq
> numbers. Now any "non -1" seq number is accepted as already resolved.
Can you explain w
Before this patch, if the sequence numbers were resolved before probe,
this code would insist on defining new non-conflicting-with-itself seq
numbers. Now any "non -1" seq number is accepted as already resolved.
Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger
---
Changes in v3:
-Add seq patch to dm core
Change
8 matches
Mail list logo