Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 17:53, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/12/19 8:24 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich, Simon,
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:00:33PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Heinrich,
> >>
> >> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 03:36, Heinrich Schuchardt
> >>
On 2/12/19 8:24 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Hi Heinrich, Simon,
>
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:00:33PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Heinrich,
>>
>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 03:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/8/19 9:15 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
# bootefi doesn't work w
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:04:19PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Takahiro,
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 02:14, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
> >
> > # bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
> >
> > This patch set came from the past discussion[1] on my "removable device
> > support" patch and is i
Simon,
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:08:10PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 01:14, AKASHI Takahiro
> wrote:
> >
> > # bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
> >
> > This patch set came from the past discussion[1] on my "removable device
> > support" patch and is in
Hi Heinrich, Simon,
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:00:33PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 03:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/19 9:15 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > # bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
> > >
> > > This patch set ca
Hi Takahiro,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 02:14, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> # bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
>
> This patch set came from the past discussion[1] on my "removable device
> support" patch and is intended to be an attempt to integrate efi objects
> into u-boot's Driver Model
Hi Heinrich,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 03:36, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/8/19 9:15 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > # bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
> >
> > This patch set came from the past discussion[1] on my "removable device
> > support" patch and is intended to be an att
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 01:14, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> # bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
>
> This patch set came from the past discussion[1] on my "removable device
> support" patch and is intended to be an attempt to integrate efi objects
> into u-boot's Driver Model as much s
On 2/8/19 9:15 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> # bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
>
> This patch set came from the past discussion[1] on my "removable device
> support" patch and is intended to be an attempt to integrate efi objects
> into u-boot's Driver Model as much seamlessly as po
# bootefi doesn't work with this patch set yet
This patch set came from the past discussion[1] on my "removable device
support" patch and is intended to be an attempt to integrate efi objects
into u-boot's Driver Model as much seamlessly as possible.
[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/20
10 matches
Mail list logo