Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM - pending PRs or patches for -rc1

The following changes since commit 58bb8f5f6138fa56875574a709f5af98c600c2a9: cosmetic: arm: fix comments in arch/arm/lib/crt0.S (2013-06-10 21:24:22 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-pxa.git master for you to fetch changes up to 847e6693ccb529bf8346db62

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM - pending PRs or patches for -rc1

Hello, (cc:ing all ARM related repo custodians for PRs) I have cleaned up my todo list for 2013.07 and am now preparing for -rc1. ARM related repo custodians who have PRs still pending to be sent to me, please do now. Any patches that their submitter feels should be in some ARM repo by now but

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM master and next fast-forwarded to current u-boot/master

Hello all, I have just fast-forwarded u-boot-arm/{master,next} to u-boot/master, in order to be able to properly pick the zynq commits in the microblaze mainline/arm branch. ARM-based tree custodians please make sure you base your PRs onto this new u-boot-arm/master. Amicalement, -- Albert. ___

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: u-boot-arm/master has merged u-boot/master up to 59852d03

Hello, Subject pretty much says it all; ARM custodians / maintainers / devs can safely assume that any commit from u-boot/master up to 59852d03 that they depend on is already in ARM. Amicalement, -- Albert. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

[U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] u-boot-arm/master rebased on current u-boot/master

Hello, I have rebased u-boot-arm/master onto u-boot/master, as of this writing that's commit 4668a086bb0a769b741e3a4ffab85f1c41c7cdb8 (sandbox: Add asm/errno.h). This is NOT a pull request: there are still at least one pull request to come from u-boot-marvell and individual patches. The pull req

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM - many build problems

Dear Thierry Reding, In message <20120709061003.ga10...@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de> you wrote: > > These have been fixed in tegra/master by the following commit: > > commit 329b71b234fd2dcc60a1369d411e4b55a8117df9 > Author: Stephen Warren > Date: Fri Jun 8 12:28:

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM - many build problems

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:25:27AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Hi all, > > after merging the latest ARM pull request, a large number of boards is > broken: > > - SUMMARY > Boards compiled: 302 > Boards with errors: 6 ( harmony seaboard ventana wh

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM - many build problems

Dear Wolfgang Denk, (07/09/2012 07:25 AM), Wolfgang Denk wrote: > cpu.c: In function 'save_boot_params_default': > cpu.c:48:1: warning: -fstack-usage not supported for this target > [enabled by default] > /bin/sh: line 1: exit: too many arguments > make[1]: *** [/work/wd/tmp-arm/dts/dt.dtb] Error

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM - many build problems

Hi all, after merging the latest ARM pull request, a large number of boards is broken: - SUMMARY Boards compiled: 302 Boards with errors: 6 ( harmony seaboard ventana whistler paz00 trimslice ) Boards with warnings but no errors: 49 ( ca9x4_ct_vxp

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

On 02/17/2012 02:45 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 14/02/2012 17:45, Rob Herring a écrit : >> Albert, >> >> On 02/12/2012 04:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for >>> which I just sent a pull request. >>> >>> The raw res

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

Le 14/02/2012 17:45, Rob Herring a écrit : Albert, On 02/12/2012 04:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi all, I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which I just sent a pull request. The raw result is: - SUMMARY Boards

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

Albert, On 02/12/2012 04:18 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for > which I just sent a pull request. > > The raw result is: > > - SUMMARY > Boards compiled: 283 > Boards with

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > > >>> Fail with various causes; I'll send out individual status mails (CC: > >>> interested parties) later today. > >>> > >>> > >> I pulled in a new u-boot-arm tree, and am able to c

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

On 12/02/2012 14:37, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Dirk, Marek, Stefano, > Hi Albert, >> Yes. The MX27, MX28, MX31, MX35 and MX5/MX6 fixes for this: >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-February/117605.html >> >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-February/117528.html >> >> http

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi, Sughosh, > > Le 12/02/2012 15:03, Sughosh Ganu a écrit : > >> hi Albert, >> >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

Hi, Sughosh, Le 12/02/2012 15:03, Sughosh Ganu a écrit : hi Albert, On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi all, I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which I just sent a pull request. The raw result is: - SUMMARY

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> hi Albert, >> >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD >> >> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which >> > I just sent a pull request. >> > >> > The raw result is: >> > >

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

> hi Albert, > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which > > I just sent a pull request. > > > > The raw result is: > > > > - SUMMARY ---

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

hi Albert, On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which > I just sent a pull request. > > The raw result is: > > - SUMMARY > Boards compiled: 283 > Bo

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

Hi Dirk, Marek, Stefano, Le 12/02/2012 12:25, Dirk Behme a écrit : On 12.02.2012 12:13, Marek Vasut wrote: Hi all, I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which I just sent a pull request. The raw result is: - SUMMARY --

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

On 12.02.2012 12:13, Marek Vasut wrote: Hi all, I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which I just sent a pull request. The raw result is: - SUMMARY Boards compiled: 283 Boards with warnings or errors: 61 ( actux1_4

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

> Hi all, > > I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for > which I just sent a pull request. > > The raw result is: > > - SUMMARY > Boards compiled: 283 > Boards with warnings or errors: 61 ( actux1_4_16 actux1_4_32 actux1

[U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM]

Hi all, I just did a ./MAKEALL arm with ELDK42 on the u-boot-arm/master for which I just sent a pull request. The raw result is: - SUMMARY Boards compiled: 283 Boards with warnings or errors: 61 ( actux1_4_16 actux1_4_32 actux1_8_16 actux1_8_3

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

On 17.09.2011 10:12, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > (board maintainers in CC:) > > Hi all, > > There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this > point in a ./MAKEALL arm: > > - SUMMARY > Boards compiled: 242 > Boards with warnings or err

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

Hi Albert, On Tuesday 20 September 2011 22:44:43 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > I do have one of these @work, but rarely take it out of the closet. I > > can run tests if required. but I am not sure if it is worth the effort > > to keep it. > > Since you concur with Stefan, I will drop it. > > > OTOH

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

Le 21/09/2011 00:58, Michael Schwingen a écrit : > Am 09/20/2011 10:44 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: >> Just tried actux3 - I get only this one warning: >>> >>> /usr/local/pkg/x-tools/armeb-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/.armeb-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: >>> >>> warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in object. >>> >>> AF

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

Am 09/20/2011 10:44 PM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: > Just tried actux3 - I get only this one warning: >> >> /usr/local/pkg/x-tools/armeb-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/.armeb-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: >> >> warning: creating a DT_TEXTREL in object. >> >> AFAIK, that one has been there since relocation was added. >

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

Hi Michael and Stefan, Le 19/09/2011 20:40, Michael Schwingen a écrit : > Am 09/17/2011 10:12 AM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: >> (board maintainers in CC:) >> >> Hi all, >> >> There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this >> point in a ./MAKEALL arm: >> >> - S

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

Am 09/17/2011 10:12 AM, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: > (board maintainers in CC:) > > Hi all, > > There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this > point in a ./MAKEALL arm: > > - SUMMARY > Boards compiled: 242 > Boards with warnings o

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

Hi Albert, On Saturday 17 September 2011 10:12:02 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > 2. ixdp425 is marked "orphaned". Stefan, I am wild-guessing that ixdp425 > might be acquainted to the ixdpg425 that you maintain. Do you want to > take ixdp425? If not, we should drop it. I don't have access to it. I vote f

[U-Boot] [STATUS] [ARM] Status for last 13 unclean-building ARM boards

(board maintainers in CC:) Hi all, There remains 13 boards listed as having warnings or errors at this point in a ./MAKEALL arm: - SUMMARY Boards compiled: 242 Boards with warnings or errors: 13 ( omap3_beagle actux1_4_16 actux1_8_16 actux1_4_32

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM status as of 2011-08-30

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4e5e0c2e.2030...@aribaud.net> you wrote: > > Got it -- actually, it is not a compiler issue, but a library issue: CS > does compile for big-endian as well as little-endian, but does not > provide big-endian libs > (

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM status as of 2011-08-30

Le 30/08/2011 21:08, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4e5d088b.7090...@aribaud.net> you wrote: >> >> I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set. >> >> Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which: >> >> - ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM status as of 2011-08-30

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4e5d088b.7090...@aribaud.net> you wrote: > > I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set. > > Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which: > > - ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with warnings or errors ( dnp1110 gcplus lart I think w

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 30/08/2011 18:36, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> Hi Albert, >> >> I just resent the series as v4 with this change - is that OK? > > Apologies -- I had not seen the V4 before posting. > > V4 is fine to me and since there was only one comment f

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

Le 30/08/2011 18:36, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Albert, > > I just resent the series as v4 with this change - is that OK? Apologies -- I had not seen the V4 before posting. V4 is fine to me and since there was only one comment for V3 and V4's only change is to address this comment, I think I ca

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 30/08/2011 17:57, Simon Glass a écrit : >> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD >>  wrote: >>> >>> Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

Le 30/08/2011 17:57, Simon Glass a écrit : > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: >> Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >>> >>> On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >>

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

Hi Albert, On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: >> Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >>> >>> On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert AR

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM status as of 2011-08-30

Hi all, I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set. Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which: - ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with warnings or errors ( dnp1110 gcplus lart shannon ep7312 evb4510 impa7 lpc2292sodimm modnet50 SMN42 jadecpu smdk2410 VCMA9 versati

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >> >> On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/mas

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

Le 30/08/2011 17:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works, >>> please try to submit them soon or at lease let me k

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

On Saturday, August 20, 2011 14:50:27 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works, > > please try to submit them soon or at lease let me know, and > > we've got some Tegra stuff that see

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: board removal

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4e564825.8080...@aribaud.net> you wrote: > > Well, to the first question the answer is "all boards in the patch set > for which an action is still required in patchwork" and to the second That would be: [U-Boot,46/52] ARM: remove broken "at91rm9200dk" board [U

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: board removal

Hi Wolfgang, Le 24/08/2011 20:11, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4e553288.9000...@aribaud.net> you wrote: >> >> Wolfgang, did you by any chance use some kind of script to produce your >> patchset, and if so, could you regenerate the set of patches for the >> remaini

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: board removal

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4e553288.9000...@aribaud.net> you wrote: > > Wolfgang, did you by any chance use some kind of script to produce your > patchset, and if so, could you regenerate the set of patches for the > remaining boards, those that currently have an 'action required' status

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: board removal

Le 24/08/2011 18:09, Reinhard Meyer a écrit : > Dear Albert, >> [snip] >> >> Also, the following boards, for which Reinhard is a delegate, are >> still undecided: >> >> [U-Boot,46/52] ARM: remove broken "at91rm9200dk" board 2011-07-17 >> Wolfgang Denk reinhardm New >> [U-Boot,45/52] ARM: remove bro

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: board removal

Dear Albert, > [snip] > > Also, the following boards, for which Reinhard is a delegate, are still > undecided: > > [U-Boot,46/52] ARM: remove broken "at91rm9200dk" board 2011-07-17 Wolfgang > Denk reinhardm New > [U-Boot,45/52] ARM: remove broken "m501sk" board 2011-07-17 Wolfgang Denk > reinhar

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: board removal

Hi all, Quick status on the 52-part ARM board removal patch. After applying various patches and pulling some repositories, the following boards are still scheduled for removal: [U-Boot,37/52] ARM: remove broken "voiceblue" board 2011-07-17 Wolfgang Denk aaribaudNew [U-Boot,36/52]

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Albert, On 08/22/2011 10:15 AM, Simon Schwarz wrote: > > Hi Albert, > > On 08/20/2011 01:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> snip> >> >> Sandeep has requested that I pick these two in u-boot-arm. >> > > > So is right that everything else in the responsibility of Sandeep won't > make it into t

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Albert, On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > Le 21/08/2011 09:11, Dirk Behme a écrit : > >> But, hmm, >> >> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=summary >> >> doesn't show the applied patches yet? Did I miss something? > > You did not; I did -- forgot

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Albert, On 08/20/2011 01:12 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >snip> > > Sandeep has requested that I pick these two in u-boot-arm. > So is right that everything else in the responsibility of Sandeep won't make it into the next release? How about the next tree? Regards Simon _

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

On 19.08.2011 00:09, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and > apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current > u-boot-arm/master tree. So: > > 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Aneesh, Le 21/08/2011 10:56, V, Aneesh a écrit : >> This indeed fixes it. Strange that the warning is not emitted by your >> toolchain. > > Yes, that's indeed strange. Even with your tool-chain it should've emitted > more warnings. Many of those unsigned variables were assigned -1 in > elsewhe

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Albert, On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > Le 21/08/2011 09:51, V, Aneesh a écrit : >> >> Hi Albert, >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : >>> >> 1. http:/

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Aneesh, Le 21/08/2011 09:51, V, Aneesh a écrit : > Hi Albert, > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : >> > 1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/ >> >> This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62,

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Dirk, On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 20.08.2011 17:32, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > ... > 2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/ >> >> This one kind of half-fixes the two boards it touches: they now bu

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Albert, On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > 1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/ > > This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62, and has been applied. > 2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

On 20.08.2011 17:32, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : ... 2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/ > > This one kind of half-fixes the two boards it touches: they now build > but with warnings, all the same, of which here is one: > > clocks.

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Dirk, Le 21/08/2011 09:11, Dirk Behme a écrit : > But, hmm, > > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=summary > > doesn't show the applied patches yet? Did I miss something? You did not; I did -- forgot to push master. Fixed now, thanks for pointing this out. > Best regards > > Dirk

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

On 20.08.2011 17:32, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > 1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/ > > This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62, and has been applied. > 2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/ > > This one kind

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM (Tegra)

On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:09:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works, > please try to submit them soon or at lease let me know, and we've got some Tegra stuff that seems to be waiting for merging (or at least feedback as to anything lef

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi all, Le 20/08/2011 13:12, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : >>> 1. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/107678/ This one lowers bad board builds from 69 to 62, and has been applied. >>> 2. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108865/ This one kind of half-fixes the two boards it touches: they now build b

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

On Saturday, August 20, 2011 02:54:02 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Marek, > > Le 20/08/2011 14:24, Marek Vasut a écrit : > > On Saturday, August 20, 2011 01:44:23 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Hi Marek, > >> > >> Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit : > >>> On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:5

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Marek, Le 20/08/2011 14:24, Marek Vasut a écrit : > On Saturday, August 20, 2011 01:44:23 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi Marek, >> >> Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit : >>> On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi all, This week-end I intend to go t

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

On Saturday, August 20, 2011 01:44:23 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Marek, > > Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit : > > On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and > >> apply those p

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Marek, Le 20/08/2011 13:16, Marek Vasut a écrit : > On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and >> apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current >> u-boot-arm/master tr

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

On Friday, August 19, 2011 12:09:56 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and > apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current > u-boot-arm/master tree. So: > > 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Aneesh, Dirk, Le 19/08/2011 20:19, Dirk Behme a écrit : > On 19.08.2011 11:38, Aneesh V wrote: >> Hi Albert, >> >> On Friday 19 August 2011 03:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and >>> apply those patches in it that st

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

On 19.08.2011 11:38, Aneesh V wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On Friday 19 August 2011 03:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and >> apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current >> u-boot-arm/master tree. So

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi Albert, On Friday 19 August 2011 03:39 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi all, > > This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and > apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current > u-boot-arm/master tree. So: > > 1) if there are any pull requests to

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM

Hi all, This week-end I intend to go through the board removal patch set and apply those patches in it that still fail to compile with the current u-boot-arm/master tree. So: 1) if there are any pull requests to u-voot-arm/master in the works, please try to submit them soon or at lease let me

[U-Boot] [STATUS] ARM: mess in repo

Hello, unfortunately I made a mess in the ARM repository last night; the commits that were supposed to be applied to the "master" branch were actually applied to the "elf_reloc" branch. I fixed this now - no damage was done to "master", but I had to rebase the "elf_reloc" branch. Sorry for the i