[U-Boot] [U-Boot, 2/7] IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus

2011-03-30 Thread Gray Remlin
Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev 1) with '(dev 0)' ? ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, 2/7] IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus

2011-03-30 Thread Gray Remlin
On 03/30/2011 07:27 PM, Gray Remlin wrote: Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev 1) with '(dev 0)' ? Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, 2/7] IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus

2011-03-30 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2011/03/30 8:49 PM, Gray Remlin wrote: On 03/30/2011 07:27 PM, Gray Remlin wrote: Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev 1) with '(dev 0)' ? Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required. Hi Gray, Please also see the thread that starts at:

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, 2/7] IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus

2011-03-30 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 30/03/2011 21:45, Rogan Dawes a écrit : On 2011/03/30 8:49 PM, Gray Remlin wrote: On 03/30/2011 07:27 PM, Gray Remlin wrote: Excuse the noob question. Is it intentional to replace '(dev 1) with '(dev 0)' ? Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required. Hi Gray, Please also