Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-08-01 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Marek Vasut, On 27.07.12 01:18, Marek Vasut wrote: > Hello, > > Check the following list, it's the list of drivers scattered (misplaced) > across > the tree. The list is not complete and might be inaccurate. But it should > give a > good impression of what I'm going to break soon: > >

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 27 July 2012 00:41:45 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Marek Vasut wrote: > > Check the following list, it's the list of drivers scattered (misplaced) > > across the tree. The list is not complete and might be inaccurate. But > > it should give a good impression of what I'm going to break soon: > >

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201207271042.48099.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > All these are either > > > > 1) old versions of flash drivers that predate the cfi flash > >implementation, so they could be replaced by the CFI driver (if > >there was someone to test this) > > Well, can t

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-27 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201207270118.19524.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Check the following list, it's the list of drivers scattered (misplaced) > > across the tree. The list is not complete and might be inaccurate. But > > it should give a good impression of what

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-26 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201207270118.19524.ma...@denx.de> you wrote: > > Check the following list, it's the list of drivers scattered (misplaced) > across > the tree. The list is not complete and might be inaccurate. But it should > give a > good impression of what I'm going to break so

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-26 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Graeme Russ, > Hi Marek, > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Graeme Russ, > > > >> Hi Marek, > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> > Dear Graeme Russ, > >> > > >> >> So neither of these files are 'drivers' per-se. They are real

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-26 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Marek, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > >> Hi Marek, >> >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> > Dear Graeme Russ, >> > >> >> So neither of these files are 'drivers' per-se. They are really just >> >> initialisation and platform sp

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-26 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Graeme Russ, > Hi Marek, > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Dear Graeme Russ, > > > >> So neither of these files are 'drivers' per-se. They are really just > >> initialisation and platform specific support functions. How do these fit > >> into the new driver model

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-26 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Marek, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > >> So neither of these files are 'drivers' per-se. They are really just >> initialisation and platform specific support functions. How do these fit >> into the new driver model? > > You can supply a pointer to th

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-26 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Marek, On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Hello, > > Check the following list, it's the list of drivers scattered (misplaced) > across > the tree. The list is not complete and might be inaccurate. But it should > give a > good impression of what I'm going to break soon: >

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] List of offending drivers

2012-07-26 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Graeme Russ, > Hi Marek, > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Check the following list, it's the list of drivers scattered (misplaced) > > across the tree. The list is not complete and might be inaccurate. But > > it should give a good impression of wh