I suppose the question would be how big the code change is versus how
many people will actually benefit. If it result in a 'big' increase in
.text or .data then it may need to be a compile time option
(CONFIG_SYS_HUGE_EXT4 or something)
I was guess that the issue lies in that the sector off
Hi Jorgen Lundman,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
>>
>> Yay, so the ext4 works for you? Why wasn't ext4 merged? Can you post the
>> reasoning (maybe links to gmane or something?)
>>
>
> I have no idea. I just needed ext4 support, and saw someone had done the
> hard work b
Yay, so the ext4 works for you? Why wasn't ext4 merged? Can you post the
reasoning (maybe links to gmane or something?)
I have no idea. I just needed ext4 support, and saw someone had done the
hard work back in Dec. I took the patches and applied them.
I have been informed that ext4 can't r
Dear Jorgen Lundman,
> > Technically, U-Boot is GPLv2+ so GPLv2 only code _may_ not be accepted
> > That is for Wolfgang to decide, but you have been warned :)
>
> Naturally, he is king after all. There will be a thousand reasons to reject
> it, but hopefully not due to license.
I wonder ... Ger
Technically, U-Boot is GPLv2+ so GPLv2 only code _may_ not be accepted That
is for Wolfgang to decide, but you have been warned :)
Naturally, he is king after all. There will be a thousand reasons to reject
it, but hopefully not due to license.
I based my GITHUB after the CuBox fork of u-
5 matches
Mail list logo